“POWER” AS AN IDENTITY CATEGORY IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE POLITICAL DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF BELARUS

Anton Dinerstein; Todd Sandel

doi:10.23858/ethp.2025.46.4052

Opublikowane: 2025-12-23

Tom 46 (2025)

“POWER” AS AN IDENTITY CATEGORY IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Anton Dinerstein , Todd Sandel

Ethnologia Polona

Dział: Temat przewodni tomu

https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2025.46.4052

Abstrakt

This paper analyses ways of speaking about politics in Russian-language political discourse by focusing on key cultural terms that describe political relationships and positionality. Data were collected from articles on Russian-language news sites and Russian-language comments on “Facebook”. The analysis shows how “power” is constructed as an identity category through oppositional codes and metonymic substitution in public political discourse. Agonistic relationships are political entities reflected in political discourse and a cornerstone for constructing and maintaining the status quo among participants in public political discussions. This analysis shows how discursive oppositions in the Belarusian context are central to the reproduction of populist rhetoric. In sum, this study advances a cultural mode of thinking about political events.

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Dinerstein, A., & Sandel, T. (2025). “POWER” AS AN IDENTITY CATEGORY IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE POLITICAL DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF BELARUS. Ethnologia Polona, 46. https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2025.46.4052

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Agar, Michael. 1994. Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
Google Scholar

Agar, Michael. 2006. “Culture: Can you Take it Anywhere?” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (2): 1-12.
Google Scholar

Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
Google Scholar

Bedford, Sofie. 2017. “‘The Election Game’: Authoritarian Consolidation Process in Belarus”. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 25 (4): 381-405.
Google Scholar

Bekus, Nelly. 2010. Struggle over Identity: The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness”. Budapest-New-York: Central European University Press.
Google Scholar

Bekus, Nelly. 2014. “‘Hybrid’ Linguistic Identity of Post-Soviet Belarus”. Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 13 (4): 26-51.
Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan, and Chris Bulcaen. 2000. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 447-466.
Google Scholar

Boromisza-Habashi, David. 2013. Speaking Hatefully: Culture, Communication, and Political Action in Hungary. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Google Scholar

Boulègue, Mathieu, Orysia Lutsevych, and Anaïs Marin. 2018. Civil Society Under Russia’s Threat: Building Resilience in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova. London: Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Boyer, Dominic, and Alexei Yurchak. 2010. “American Stiob: Or, What Late-Socialist Aesthetics of Parody Reveal about Contemporary Political Culture in the West”. Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 179-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15481360.2010.01056.x
Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. 2019. “Populism and Nationalism”. Nations and Nationalism 26 (5): 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12522
Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”. Discourse Studies 7 (4-5): 585-614.
Google Scholar

Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B. 2020. “Metaphor, Metonymy and Evaluation as Political Devices in American and Spanish Parliamentary Political Discourse”. Iberica 40: 75-100.
Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal, and Sally Hastings. 1992. “A Role of Communication Theory in Ethnography and Cultural Analysis”. Communication Theory 2: 156-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00035.x
Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal. 1996. Situating Selves: The Communication of Social Identities in American Scenes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal. 2007. “Cultural Discourse Analysis: Communication Practices and Intercultural Encounters”. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36 (3): 167-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737090
Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal. 2017. “Terms for Talk, Take 2: Theorizing Communication through Its Cultural Terms and Practices”. In The Handbook of Communication in Cross-cultural Perspective, edited by Donal Carbaugh, 15-28. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal, Trudy Milburn, Michelle Scollo and Brion van Over. 2024. “Cultural Discourse Analysis: Discourse Hubs as Heuristic Devices”. In The Routledge Handbook of Cultural Discourse Studies, edited by Shi-xu, 277-294. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Cherniyavskaya, Yulia. 2006. A Belarusian: Sketches to a Self-portrait (In Russian: Белорус: штрихи к автопортрету). Minsk: Four Quarters.
Google Scholar

Cherniyavskaya, Yulia. 2010. Belarusians: From “Locals” to a Nation (In Russian: Белорусы от “тутэйшых” – к нации). Minsk: FUAinform.
Google Scholar

De Fina, Anna. 2011. “Discourse and Identity”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun van Dijk, 263-282. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Google Scholar

Dinerstein, Anton. 2021. “Cultural Identity in Modern-day Belarusian Discourse on Public Creativity.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 14 (1): 41-59, DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2019.1677934
Google Scholar

Dinerstein, Anton. 2024. Dataset for project “Power and Identity in Russian-language Political Discourse: The Case of Belarus”. RepOD, V1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18150/UQBROH.
Google Scholar

Dinerstein, Anton, and Todd Sandel. 2023. “‘We Have a Point on the Map’: Discursive Constructions of Belarusian Identity during CreativeMornings Minsk.” Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 52 (4): 440-460. DOI: 10.1080/17475759.2023.2223568
Google Scholar

Dinerstein, Anton, and Todd Sandel. 2024. “Transforming Culture through ‘Communication’ (Rituals): The ‘Banality’ of Public Creativity in Belarus.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 17 (3): 269-292. DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2024.2363249
Google Scholar

Engelking, Anna. 2013. “Simple Hardworking Christian Folks, or the Self-Image of Contemporary Belarusian Kolkhozniks: An Anthropologist’s Assessment of a Two-Decade Research Study”. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 27 (2): 260-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325412469663
Google Scholar

Euroradio. 2020. “Ermoshina: The Tsikanovski Group Directed the Collection of Signatures toward the Change of Power”. Euroradio, June 17. Accessed 01 November 2025: https://euroradio.fm/ru/ermoshina-gruppa-tihanovskogo-napravlyala-sbor-podpisey-na-smenu-vlasti
Google Scholar

Fabrykant, Marharyta. 2019. “Russian-speaking Belarusian Nationalism: An Ethnolinguistic Identity without a Language?” Europe-Asia Studies 71 (1): 117-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1555796
Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Fitch, Kristine. 2005. “Ethnography of Communication”. In The Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 323-326. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2004. The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge
Google Scholar

Goujon, Alexandra. 2010. “Memorial Narratives of WW2 Partisans and Genocide in Belarus”. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 24 (1): 6–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325409355818
Google Scholar

Greene, Samuel. 2022. “You are what you read: media, identity, and community in the 2020 Belarusian uprising”. Post-Soviet Affairs 38 (1-2): 88-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2031843
Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 1990. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora”. In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, 222–237. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Google Scholar

Ioffe, Grigory. 2008. Understanding Belarus and how Western Foreign Policy Misses the Mark. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Google Scholar

Katriel, Tamar. 1985. “‘Griping’ as a Verbal Ritual in Some Israeli Discourse”. In Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Approach, edited by Marcelo Dascal, 367-381. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Katriel, Tamar. 2004. Dialogic Moments: From Soul Talks to Talk Radio in Israeli Culture. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Google Scholar

Kharkhordin, Oleg. 2001. “What is the State? The Russian Concept of Gosudarstvo in the European Context”. History and Theory 40 (2): 206-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00163
Google Scholar

Klymenko, Lina. 2016. “Nation-building and Presidential Rhetoric in Belarus”. Journal of Language and Politics 15 (6): 727-747. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
Google Scholar

Kroskrity, Paul. 2000. “Identity”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1-2): 111-114.
Google Scholar

Kubik, Jan. 1994. The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Google Scholar

Kudaibergenova, Diana. 2020. Toward Nationalizing Regimes: Conceptualizing Power and Identity in the Post-Soviet Realm. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. 2005. “Ethnography”. In The Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 327-347. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Manaev, Oleg. 2014. “Media in Post-Soviet Belarus: Between Democratization and Reinforcing Authoritarianism”. Demokratizatsiya 22 (2): 207-229.
Google Scholar

Pham, Lien, and Ance Kaleja. 2021. Political Participation and Democratic Capability in Authoritarian Countries. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Philipsen, Gerry. 2002. “Cultural Communication”. In Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication, edited by William Gudykunst and Bella Mody, 51-67. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Philipsen, Gerry. 2009. “Researching Culture in Contexts of Social Interaction: An Ethnographic Approach, a Network of Scholars, Illustrative Moves”. In Distinctive Qualities in Communication Research, edited by Donal Carbaugh and Patrice Buzzanell, 87-105. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Pryanikov, Pavel. 2020 “The Chair of the Belarusian Election Commission: ‘The Opposition Wanted to Seize Power via Elections.’” Twitter, September 5. Accessed 05 January 2022. https://twitter.com/netovetz/status/1302014914068910080
Google Scholar

Rohava, Maryia. 2017. “Identity in an Autocratic State or what Belarusians Talk about when they Talk about National Identity”. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 32 (3): 639-668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325417741343
Google Scholar

Rohava, Maryia. 2020. “The Politics of State Celebrations in Belarus”. Nations and Nationalism 26 (4): 883-901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12653
Google Scholar

Sandel, Todd. 2015. “Rich points”. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1st Edition, edited by Karen Tracy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781118611463/wbielsi167
Google Scholar

Sotirova, Nadezhda. 2018. “A Cry and an Outcry: Oplakvane (Complaining) as a Term for Communication Practice”. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 11 (4), 304-323. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1479439
Google Scholar

Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2017. “Discourse Theory in Populism Research: Three Challenges and a Dilemma”. Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 523-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta
Google Scholar

Street, Tim. 2019. “SAC Community Selected Belarusian Mural best of November”. Street Art Cities, December 12. Accessed 14 February 2025. https://blog.streetartcities.com/sac-community-selected-belarusian-mural-best-of-november-e4ef974f0b95
Google Scholar

The Russia Program. 2024. “What is Putin thinking? A quantitative analysis of Putin’s public discourse derived from computational linguistic research of his speeches”. The Russia Program. Accessed 6 May 2024. https://therussiaprogram.org/putinshead
Google Scholar

Tracy, Karen. 2002. Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Uspenskij, Boris. 2021. “Gospodar Velikij Novgorod”: The Origins of the Title” (In Russian: «Господарь Великий Новгород»: происхождение названия). Древняя Русь. Вопросы медиевистики 3, 24-44. DOI: 10.25986/IRI.2021.85.3.003
Google Scholar

Uspenskij, Boris. 2023. Russian gosudar’ ‘sovereign’: Нistory and Etymology of the Word (In Russian: Государь: история и этимология слова). Вопросы языкознания 1, 7-18. DOI: 10.31857/0373-658X.2023.1.7-18
Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun. 2007. Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University.
Google Scholar

Vasilyeva, Alena. 2019. “Language Ideology and Identity Construction in Public Educational Meetings”. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 12 (2): 146-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2019.1575453
Google Scholar

Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2024. “Affordances and Constraints of Election Debate Formats.” In Beyond the Cold War: Presidential Rhetoric in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Rebecca M. Townsend, 187–208. New York: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Vasmer, Max. 1996a. Russian Etymological Dictionary, vol. 1. Moscow: Progress.
Google Scholar

Vasmer, Max. 1996b. Russian Etymological Dictionary, vol. 3. Moscow: Progress.
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding Cultures through their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Wilkins, Richard. 2006. “Agonistic Depictions of Communication: Vaikeneminen [Silence] Versus Puhuminen [Speaking] in Classroom Settings for Adult Education in Finland”. Atlantic Journal of Communication 14 (4): 247-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15456889ajc1404_4
Google Scholar

Wilkins, Richard. 2017. “The Optimal Form and its Use in Cross-Cultural Analysis: A British ‘Stiff Upper Lip’ and a Finnish Matter-of-Fact Style”. In The Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Donal Carbaugh, 129-141. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Andrew. 2011. Belarus: The Last European Dictatorship. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Winchatz, Michaela. 2017. “Jammern [Whining] as a German Way of Speaking”. In The Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Donal Carbaugh, 66-75. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2020. “The Trajectory of Far-right Populism – a Discourse-analytical Perspective”. In The Far-right and the Environment: Politics, Discourse, and Communication, edited by Bernhard Forchtner, 21-37. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Yurchak, Alexei. 2005. Everything was Forever, until it was no More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar