Prehistoric Stone Raw Materials from the Bükk Mountains in Northeastern Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23858/APa60.2022.3084Keywords:
petrography, raw material economy, quartz-porphyry, silicified sandstone, radiolarite, Palaeolithic, NeolithicAbstract
From the period of the Neanderthals to those of the Late Neolithic populations, the Bükk Mountains region played an important part in the lives of various prehistoric societies, and the varied geological history of this territory provided distinct circumstances for the production of stone implements. The major goal of our research is to outline the current state of information concerning the prehistoric use of the diverse silicified source materials of the Bükk mountains. The results of these studies are presented concerning four selected local rock types, cited in the archaeological literature as the silicified sandstone of Egerbakta, the radiolarite and hornstone (black chert), the silicified marlstone and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). Except for the latter, little attention has previously been paid to studying them in detail. Our new petrographic analyses revealed two variants of the raw material from Egerbakta: a silicified sandstone and a diatomaceous detrital chert. The other samples turned out to be radiolarites. This result confirmed what was already suggested for the hornstones (black cherts), however, it has new consequences for the “silicified marlstone”. Regarding the prehistoric use of the selected raw materials, archaeological data show interesting dynamics through time. The Mousterian groups of the region used a large spectrum of rocks for lithic tools with a preference for hornstone (black cherts) and radiolarite in the southern part, and the quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite) in the northeastern part. The Bábonyian/Micoquian assemblages are characterized by a bifacial toolkit and an apparent preference for quartz-porphyry (metarhyolite). At the beginning of the Upper Palaeolithic, a new attitude appears in the region: the Aurignacian groups almost completely ignored local sources. During the Neolithization of the Carpathian Basin, the lithic assemblages of the Alföld Linear Pottery culture became more and more habituated to the locally available rock types, albeit their raw material economy was based on limnosilicites and obsidian. Another change took place during the Late Neolithic when supra-regional sources became dominant over local or regional sources.
Downloads
References
Adams, B. 2000. Archaeological investigations at two open-air sites in the Bükk Mountain region of Northeast Hungary. In J. Orschiedt and G.-C. Weniger (eds), Neanderthals and Modern Humans – discussing the transition: Central and Eastern Europe from 50.000–30.000 B. P., 169–182. Mettmann. Wissenschaftliche Schriften des Neanderthal Museums 2.
Audouze, F. and Karlin, C. 2017. La chaîne opératoire a 70 ans: qu’en ont fait les préhistoriens français. Journal of Lithic Studies 4(2): 5–73.
Bácskay, E. and Simán, K. 1987. Some remarks on chipped stone industries of the earliest Neolithic populations in present Hungary. Archaeologia Interregionalis 240: 107–130.
Balogh, K. 1964. A Bükkhegység földtani képződményei. Die geologischen Bildungen des Bükk-Gebirges. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évkönyve 48(2): 245–719.
Bánffy, E. and Bognár-Kutzián, I. 2007. The Late Neolithic tell settlement at Polgár-Csőszhalom, Hungary: the 1957 excavation. Oxford. Archaeopress. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1730, Archaeolingua Central European Series 4.
Bartucz, L., Dancza, J., Hollendonner, F., Kadić, O., Mottl, M., Pataki, V., Pálosi, E., Szabó, J. and Vendl, A. 1940. Die Mussolini-Höhle (Subalyuk) bei Cserépfalu. Budapest. Geologica Hungarica, Series Palaeontologica 14.
Béres, S. and Kerekes, D. 2021. Demjén-Szőlő-hegy III korai felső paleolit lelőhely [The Demjén-Szőlő-
-hegy III Early Upper Palaeolithic site]. In N. Faragó, A. Király and K. I. Szegedi (eds), A tealevelektől a levélhegyekig. Tanulmányok Mester Zsolt tiszteletére 60. születésnapja alkalmából, 63–75. Budapest. Litikum Könyvtár 1.
Biró, K. T. (ed.) 1986. Papers for the 1st International Conference on Prehistoric Flint Mining and Lithic Raw Material Identification in the Carpathian Basin, Budapest–Sümeg 1986, vol. 1. Budapest.
Biró, K. T. (ed.) 1987a. Papers for the 1st International Conference on Prehistoric Flint Mining and Lithic Raw Material Identification in the Carpathian Basin, Budapest–Sümeg 1986, vol. 2. Budapest.
Biró, K. T. 1987b. Chipped stone industry of the Linearband Pottery Culture in Hungary. Archaeologia Interregionalis 240: 131–167.
Biró, K. T. 1998. Lithic Implements and the Circulation of Raw Materials in the Great Hungarian Plain during the Late Neolithic Period. Budapest.
Biró, K. T. 2002. Advances in the study of Early Neolithic lithic materials in Hungary. Antaeus 25: 119–168.
Biró, K. T. 2004. Provenancing: methods, possibilities, problems. Antaeus 27: 95–110.
Biró, K. T. 2009. Sourcing raw materials for chipped stone artifacts: the state-of-the-art in Hungary and the Carpathian basin. In B. Adams and B. S. Blades (eds), Lithic Materials and Paleolithic Societies, 47–53. Oxford.
Biró, K. T. 2010. Terminological practice for siliceous rocks in Hungary from petroarchaeological point of view. Archeometriai Műhely 2010(3): 195–201.
Biró, K. T. 2014. Mezőkövesd-Mocsolyás: A kőanyag értékelése [Mezőkövesd-Mocsolyás: evaluation of the lithic material]. In N. Kalicz and J. Koós (eds), Mezőkövesd-Mocsolyás. A neolitikus Szatmár-csoport (AVK I) települése és temetője a Kr. e. 6. évezred második feléből, 205–280. Miskolc. Borsod-Abaúj-
-Zemplén megye Régészeti Emlékei 9.
Biró, K. T. and Dobosi, V. T. 1991. Lithotheca – Comparative Raw Material Collection of the Hungarian National Museum. Budapest.
Biró, K. T. and Pálosi, M. 1985. A pattintott kőeszközök nyersanyagának forrásai Magyarországon [Sources of lithic raw materials for chipped artefacts in Hungary]. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentése az 1983. évről: 407–435.
Biró, K. T., Dobosi, V. T. and Schléder, Zs. 2000. Lithotheca II – The Comparative Raw Material Collection of the Hungarian National Museum, Vol. II. Budapest.
Biró, K. T., Szilágyi V. and Kasztovszky, Zs. 2009. Új adatok a Kárpát-medence régészeti radiolarit forrásainak ismeretéhez. Archeometriai Műhely 6(3): 25–44.
Bonjean, D. and Otte, M. 2004. Une organisation fonctionelle de l’espace d’habitat. Le cas de la grotte Scladina (Sclayn, Belgique). In N. J. Conard (ed.), Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age. Volume II., 261–271. Tübingen.
Brandl, M. 2014. Genesis, provenance and classification of rocks within the chert group in Central Europe. Archaeologica Austriaca 97–98 (2013–2014): 33–58.
Chmielewski, W. 1961. Civilisation de Jerzmanowice. Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków.
Dobosi, V. T. 1976. Prehistoric settlement at Demjén-Hegyeskőbérc. Folia Archaeologica 27: 9–40.
Dobosi, V. 2009. Filling the void: Lithic raw material utilization during the Hungarian Gravettian. In B. Adams and B. S. Blades (eds), Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies, 116–126. Oxford.
Domboróczki, L. 2003. Radiocarbon data from Neolithic archaeological sites in Heves County (North-Eastern Hungary). Agria 39: 5–71.
Domboróczki, L. 2009. Settlement structures of the Alföld Linear Pottery Culture (ALPC) in Heves county (North-eastern Hungary): Development models and historical reconstructions on micro, meso and macro levels. In J. K. Kozłowski (ed.), Interactions between different models of Neolithization north of the Central European Agro-Ecological Barrier, 75–127. Kraków. Prace Komisji Prehistorii Karpat PAU 5.
Dövényi, Z. (ed.) 2010. Magyarország kistájainak katasztere. Budapest.
Faragó, N. 2017. Differences in the selection of raw materials at the site of Polgár-Csőszhalom, northeast Hungary. Bulgarian e-Journal of Archaeology 7: 85–115.
Faragó, N. 2019. Complex, household-based analysis of the stone tools of Polgár-Csőszhalom. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Ser. 3 No. 7: 301–329.
Faragó, N. 2021. The Late Neolithic flint exchange network in the Great Hungarian Plain. Hungarian Archaeology 10(3): 53–58.
Faragó, N., Tutkovics, E. K. and Kalli, A. 2015. Előzetes jelentés Bükkábrány-Bánya, VII. lelőhely pattintott kőeszköz anyagáról. A Herman Ottó Múzeum Évkönyve 54: 25–37.
Faragó, N., Péter, R. K., Cserpák, F., Kraus, D. and Mester, Zs. 2018. New Perspectives on the problems of the exploitation area and the Prehistoric use of the Buda hornstone in Hungary. Archaeologia Polona 56: 167–189.
Féblot-Augustins, J. 1999. La mobilité des groupes paléolithiques. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, 11(3–4): 219–260.
Féblot-Augustins, J. 2009. Les ressources siliceuses du Bugey: caractérisation pétrographique des matières premières. In J. L. Voruz (ed.), La grotte du Gardon (Ain). Volume I: Le site et la séquence néolithique des couches 60 à 47, 167–200. Toulouse.
Fodor, L. 1984. Néhány őskori lelőhely Eger környékén [Einige prähistorische Fundstellen in der Umgebung von Eger]. Agria 20: 73–116.
Fülöp, J. 1973. Funde des prähistorischen Silexgrubenbaues am Kálvária-Hügel von Tata. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25: 3–25.
Füzesi, A. 2019. Interaction between landscapes and communities in the Neolithic: modeling socioecological changes in Northeast-Hungary between 6000–4000 BC. Hungarian Archaeology 8(3): 1–11.
Füzesi, A. and Raczky, P. 2018. Öcsöd-Kováshalom. Potscape of a Late Neolithic site in the Tisza region. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Ser. 3 No. 6: 43–146.
Füzesi, A., Faragó, N. and Raczky, P. 2017. Tiszaug-Railway-station. An archaic Middle Neolithic community on the Great Hungarian Plain. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Ser. 3 No. 5: 7–65.
Füzesi, A., Tutkovics, E., Kalli, A. and Faragó, N. 2021. Patterns in material culture: data for social practices and activities in the early ALPC settlement of Bükkábrány-Bánya VII (Northeast-Hungary). Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 73(1): 271–308.
Gamble, C. 1999. The Palaeolithic societies of Europe. Cambridge.
Geneste, J.-M. 1988. Systèmes d’approvisionnement en matières premières au Paléolithique moyen et au Paléolithique supérieur en Aquitaine. In J. K. Kozłowski (ed.), L’Homme de Néandertal: Actes du colloque international de Liège (4–7 décembre 1986). Volume 8: La mutation, 61–70. Liège. E.R.A.U.L. 35.
Geneste, J.-M. 1991. Systèmes techniques de production lithique: variations techno-économiques dans les processus de réalisation des outillages paléolithiques. Techniques and culture 17–18: 1–35.
Gyalog, L. (ed.) 2005. Magyarázó Magyarország fedett földtani térképéhez (az egységek rövid leírása) 1:100 000. Budapest. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet térképmagyarázói.
Harangi, Sz. 2001. Neogen to Quaternary Volcanism of the Carpathian-Pannonian Region – a review. Acta Geologica Hungarica 44(2–3): 223–258.
Harangi, Sz. and Lenkey, L. 2007. Genesis of the Neogene to Quaternary volcanism in the Carpathian-
-Pannonian region: Role of subduction, extension, and mantle plume. In L. Beccaluva, G. Bian-
chini and M. Wilson (eds), Cenozoic Volcanism in the Mediterranean Area, 67–92. Boulder. Geological Society of America Special Paper 418.
Hartai, É. and Szakáll, S. 2005. Geological and mineralogical background of the Palaeolithic chert mining on the Avas Hill, Miskolc, Hungary. Praehistoria 6: 15–21.
Herman, O. 1893. Der paläolithische Fund von Miskolc. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 23: 77–82.
Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H. and Tixier, J. 1999. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone. Nanterre. Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée 5.
Kaczanowska, M. 1985. Rohstoffe, Technik und Typologie der neolithischen Feuersteinindustrien im Nordteil des Flussgebietes der Mitteldonau. Warszawa.
Kaczanowska, M. and Kozłowski, J. K. 2015. Raw materials circulation, organization of production and lithic technology in the Neolithic/Early Copper Age transition. In S. Hansen, P. Raczky, A. Anders and A. Reingruber (eds), Neolithic and Copper Age between the Carpathians and the Aegean Sea. Chronoligies and Technologies from the 6th to the 4th Millennium BCE. International Workshop Budapest 2012, 93–104. Bonn. Archäologie in Eurasien 31.
Kaczanowska, M., Kozłowski, J. K. and Sümegi, P. 2009. Lithic industries from the Öcsöd-Kováshalom tell-like settlement in Hungary. In F. Draşovean, D. L. Ciobotaru and M. Madison (eds), Ten Years After: The Neolithic of the Balkans, as Uncovered by the Last Decade of Research. Proceedings of the Conference held at the Museum of Banat on November 9th–10th, 125–149. Timişoara.
Kadić, O. 1916. Ergebnisse der Erforschung der Szeletahöhle. Mitteilungen aus dem Jahrbuche der königlichen Ungarischen Geologischen Reichsanstalt 23: 161–301.
Kadić, O. 1934. Der Mensch zur Eiszeit in Ungarn. Mitteilungen aus dem Jahrbuch der kgl. Ungarischen Geologischen Anstalt 30: 1–147.
Kadić, O. 1940. Cserépfalu vidékének barlangjai [Die Höhlen der Umgebung von Cserépfalu]. Barlangkutatás 16(2): 141–274.
Kadić, O. 1944. Az északnyugati Bükk barlangjai [Die Höhlen des nordwestlichen Bükkgebirges]. Barlangkutatás 17: 1–111.
Kadić, O. and Mottl, M. 1938. Felsőtárkány vidékének barlangjai [Die Höhlen der Umgebung von Felsőtárkány]. Barlangkutatás 16(1): 8–89.
Kalicz, N. 2008. Aszód: Ein gemischter Fundort der Lengyel- und Theiss-kultur. Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 2008: 5–54.
Kalicz, N. and Koós, J. (eds) 2014. Mezőkövesd-Mocsolyás. A neolitikus Szatmár-csoport (AVK I) települése és temetője a Kr. e. 6. évezred második feléből, 205–280. Miskolc. Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye Régészeti Emlékei 9.
Kaminská, Ľ., Kozłowski, J. K. and Škrdla, P. 2011. New approach to the Szeletian – chronology and cultural variability. Eurasian Prehistory 8(1–2): 29–49.
Karátson, G. 2006. Aspects of Quaternary relief evolution of Miocene volcanic areas in Hungary: A review. Acta Geologica Hungarica 49: 285–309.
Karlin, C., Bodu, P. and Pelegrin, J. 1991. Processus technique et chaînes opératoires: comment les préhistoriens s’approprient un concept élaboré par les ethnologues. In H. Balfet (ed.), Observer l’action technique: des chaînes opératoires, pour quoi faire?, 97–113. Paris.
Kasztovszky, Zs. and Přichystal, A. 2018. An overview of the analytical techniques applied to study the Carpathian obsidians. Archeometriai Műhely 15(3): 187–196.
Kasztovszky, Zs. and Biró, K. T. 2006. Fingerprinting Carpathian obsidians by PGAA: first results on geological and archaeological specimens. In 34th International Symposium on Archaeometry, 3–7 May 2004 Zaragoza, Spain, 301–308. Zaragoza.
Kozłowski, J. K. 2006. Les Néandertaliens en Europe centrale. In B. Demarsin and M. Otte (eds), Neanderthals in Europe. Proceedings of the International Conference held in the Gallo-Roman Museum in Tongeren (September 17–19th 2004), 77–90. Liège. E.R.A.U.L. 117.
Kozłowski, J. K. (ed.) 2009. Interactions between different models of neolithization north of the central european agro-ecological barrier. Papers presented on the symposium organized by the EU Project FEPRE. Krakow.
Kozłowski, J. K. and Mester, Zs. 2003–2004. Un nouveau site du Paléolithique supérieur dans la région d’Eger (Nord-est de la Hongrie). Praehistoria 4–5: 109–140.
Kozłowski, J. K., Mester, Zs., Zandler, K., Budek, A., Kalicki, T., Moskal, M. and Ringer, Á. 2009. Le Paléolithique moyen et supérieur de la Hongrie du nord: nouvelles investigations dans la région d’Eger. L’Anthropologie 113: 399–453.
Kozłowski, J. K., Mester, Zs., Budek, A., Kalicki, T., Moskal-del Hoyo, M., Zandler, K. and Béres, S. 2012. La mise en valeur d’un ancien site éponyme: Eger-Kőporos dans le Paléolithique moyen et supérieur de la Hongrie du nord. L’Anthropologie 116: 405–465.
Lech, J. 2003. Mining and siliceous rock supply to the Danubian early farming communities (LBK) in Eastern Central Europe: A second approach. In L. Burnez-Lanotte (ed.), Production and Management of Lithic Materials in the European Linearbandkeramik, 19–30. Oxford. Archaeopress. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1200.
Lemonnier, P. 1986. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5: 147–186.
Lichardus, J. 1974. Studien zur Bükker Kultur. Bonn. Saarbrücker Beiträge zu Altertumskunde Band 12.
Markó, A. 2007. Preliminary report on the excavations of the Middle Palaeolithic site Vanyarc – Szlovácka-dolina. Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 2007: 5–15.
Markó, A. 2009. Raw material circulation during the Middle Palaeolithic period in northern Hungary. In J. Gancarski (ed.), Surowce naturalne w Karpatach oraz ich wykorzystanie w pradziejach i wczesnym średniowieczu, 107–120. Krosno.
Markó, A. 2015. Istállóskő revisited: Lithic artefacts and assemblages, sixty years after. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 66: 5–38.
Markó, A., Biró, K. T. and Kasztovszky, Zs. 2003. Szeletian felsitic porphyry: non-destructive analysis of a classical Palaeolithic raw material. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54: 297–314.
Mateiciucová, I. 2007. Worked stone: obsidian and flint. In A. Whittle (ed.), The Early Neolithic on the Great Hungarian Plain. Investigations of the Körös Culture site of Ecsegfalva 23, County Békés, 677–726. Budapest. Varia Archaeologica Hungarica 21.
Mester, Zs. 1990. La transition vers le Paléolithique supérieur des industries moustériennes de la montagne de Bükk (Hongrie). In C. Farizy (ed.), Paléolithique moyen récent et Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Europe. Ruptures et transitions: examen critique des documents archéologiques. Actes du Colloque international de Nemours 9–10–11 Mai 1988, 111–113. Nemours. Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d’Île de France 3.
Mester, Zs. 1995. Le matériel lithique de la grotte Büdöspest: faciès d’atelier ou industrie intermédiaire? In Les industries à pointes foliacées d’Europe centrale. Actes du Colloque de Miskolc, 10–15 septembre 1991, 31–35. Paléo – Supplément N° 1, Juin 1995.
Mester, Zs. 2000a. Apparition du Jankovichien au sud de la montagne de Bükk (Hongrie). In Zs. Mester and Á. Ringer (eds), À la recherche de l’Homme préhistorique. Volume commémoratif de Miklós Gábori et de Veronika Gábori-Csánk, 247–255. Liège. E.R.A.U.L. 95.
Mester, Zs. 2000b. Sur la présence du silex de Świeciechów dans l’Abri de Sólyomkút (montagne de Bükk, Hongrie). Praehistoria 1: 83–93.
Mester, Zs. 2004. Technologie des industries moustériennes de la grotte Suba-lyuk (Hongrie). In: Le Secrétariat du Congrès (ed.), Actes du XIVe Congrès UISPP, Université de Liège, Belgique, 2–8 septembre 2001. Section 5: Le Paléolithique moyen: Sessions générales et posters, 127–133. Oxford. Archaeopress. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1239.
Mester, Zs. 2013. The lithic raw material sources and interregional human contacts in the Northern Carpathian regions: Aims and methodology. In Zs. Mester (ed.), The lithic raw material sources and interregional human contacts in the Northern Carpathian regions, 9–21. Kraków–Budapest.
Mester, Zs. 2014. Le Szélétien. In M. Otte (ed.), Neandertal / Cro Magnon – La Rencontre, 149–188. Arles.
Mester, Zs. 2019. How did Stone Age communities exploit the available resources? Hungarian Archaeology e-journal 2019 Summer: 1–4.
Mester, Zs. and Faragó, N. 2013. The lithic raw material sources and interregional human contacts in the Northern Carpathian regions: Report and preliminary results of the field surveys. In Zs. Mester (ed.), The lithic raw material sources and interregional human contacts in the Northern Carpathian regions, 23–37. Kraków–Budapest.
Mester, Zs. and Faragó, N. 2016. Prehistoric exploitations of limnosilicites in Northern Hungary: problems and perspectives. Archaeologia Polona 54: 33–50.
Mester, Zs. and Faragó, N. in press. From Bedrock to Alluvium: Considerations on human–lithic resource interaction. Journal of Lithic Studies.
Mester, Zs. and Kozłowski, J. K. 2014. Modes de contacts des Aurignaciens du site d’Andornaktálya (Hongrie) à la lumière de leur économie particulière de matières premières. In M. Otte and F. Le Brun-Ricalens (eds), Modes de contacts et de déplacements au Paléolithique eurasiatique. Modes of contact and mobility during the Eurasian Palaeolithic, 349–367. Luxembourg. E.R.A.U.L. 140, ArchéoLogiques 5.
Mester, Zs. and Patou-Mathis, M. 2016. Nouvelle interprétation des occupations néanderthaliennes de la grotte Subalyuk (Hongrie du Nord). Acta Archaeologica Carpathica 51: 7–46.
Mester, Zs., Faragó, N. and Lengyel, Gy. 2012. The lithic raw material sources and interregional human contacts in the northern Carpathian regions: A research program. Anthropologie (Brno) 50(3): 275–293.
Mester, Zs., Kozłowski, J. K., Kalicki, T., Dobos, A., Frączek, M., Zandler, K., Gutay, M., Béres, S. and Cserpák, F. 2021. Nouveaux assemblages du Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Hongrie du nord dans le contexte de l’hypothèse du Couloir danubien. L’Anthropologie 125: 102914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2021.102914
Otte, M., Bonjean, D. and Patou-Mathis, M. 2001. Contractions temporelles au Paléolithique de Sclayn: l’utilisation de différents paysages. In N. J. Conard (ed.), Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age, 261–271. Tübingen.
Pelegrin, J., Karlin, C. and Bodu, P. 1988. Chaînes opératoires»: un outil pour le préhistorien. In J. Tixier (ed.), Journée d’études technologiques en Préhistoire, 55–62. Paris. Notes et Monographies Techniques 25.
Pelikán, P. 1986. The Mesozoic siliceous rocks of the Bükk Mountains. In K. T. Biró (ed.), Papers for the 1st International Conference on Prehistoric Flint Mining and Lithic Raw Material Identification in the Carpathian Basin, Budapest–Sümeg 1986, vol. 1, 177–180. Budapest.
Pelikán, P. (ed.) 2005. Geology of the Bükk Mountains. Explanatory Book to the Geological Map of the Bükk Mountains (1:50 000). Budapest.
Pinczés, Z. 1980. Production of planation surfaces and their types as illustrated on the examples of a Tertiary volcanic and of a Mesozoic mountain. Acta Geographina Debrecina 14–15: 5–29.
Pinczés, Z., Martonné Erdős, K. and Dobos, A. 1993. Eltérések és hasonlóságok a hegylábfelszínek pleisztocén felszínfejlődésében. Földrajzi Közlemények 117: 149–162.
Prehistoric Ceramic Research Group (PCRG). 2010. The study of later prehistoric pottery: General policies and guidelines for analysis and publication. Occasional papers Nos 1 and 2, 3rd Edition Revised. https://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20(2010).pdf (Accessed 05.12.2021)
Přichystal, A. 2010. Classification of lithic raw materials used for prehistoric chipped artefacts in general and siliceous sediments (silicites) in particular: the Czech proposal. Archeometriai Műhely 7(3): 177–181.
Přichystal, A. 2013. Lithic raw materials in Prehistoric times of Central Europe. Brno.
Prošek, F. 1953. Szeletien na Slovensku [Le Szeletien en Slovaquie]. Slovenská Archeologia 1: 133–194.
Raczky, P. 2009. Archaeological data on space use at tell-like settlement of the Tisza Culture [New results from Öcsöd-Kováshalom]. In F. Draşovean, D. L. Ciobotaru and M. Madison (eds), Ten Years After: The Neolithic of the Balkans, as Uncovered by the Last Decade of Research. Proceedings of the Conference held at the Museum of Banat on November 9th–10th, 101–124. Timişoara.
Raczky, P., Anders, A., Sebők, K., Csippán, P. and Tóth, Zs. 2015. The times of Polgár-Csőszhalom – Chronologies of human activities in a Late Neolithic settlement in Northeastern Hungary. In S. Hansen, P. Raczky, A. Anders and A. Reingruber (eds), Neolithic and Copper Age between the Carpathians and the Aegean Sea. Chronologies and Technologies from the 6th to the 4th Millennium BCE. International Workshop Budapest 2012, 21–48. Bonn. Archäologie in Eurasien 31.
Renfrew, C. 1984. Trade as action at distance. In C. Renfrew (ed.), Approaches to social archaeology, 86–134. Cambridge.
Ringer, Á. 1983. Bábonyien. Eine mittelpaläolithische Blattwerkzeugindustrie in Nordostungarn. Budapest. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Ser. II. No. 11.
Ringer, Á. and Mester, Zs. 2000. Résultats de la révision de la grotte Szeleta entreprise en 1999 et 2000. Anthropologie (Brno) 38: 261–270.
Schréter, Z. 1916. Néhány adat a borsod–hevesi Bükk-hegység ősrégészetéhez [Beiträge zur Archäologie des Borsod–Heveser Bükkgebirges]. Barlangkutatás 4(2): 86–88, 105–106.
Sebők, K. and Faragó, N. 2018. Theory into practice: basic connections and stylistic affiliations of the Late Neolithic settlement at Pusztataskony-Ledence 1. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Ser. 3 No. 6: 147–178.
Seghedi, I., Downes, H., Harangi, Sz., Mason, P. R. D. and Pécskay, Z. 2005. Geochemical response of magmas to Neogene–Quaternary continental collision in the Carpathian–Pannonian region: A review. Tectonophysics 410: 485–499.
Sellet, F. 1993. Chaîne opératoire: the concept and its applications. Lithic Technology 18(1–2): 106–112.
Simán, K. 1986. Felsitic quartz porphyry. In K. T. Biró (ed.), Papers for the 1st International Conference on Prehistoric Flint Mining and Lithic Raw Material Identification in the Carpathian Basin, Budapest–Sümeg 1986, vol. 1, 271–275. Budapest.
Simán, K. 1991. Procurement and distribution of raw materials in the Palaeolithic of North-East Hungary. In A. Montet-White (ed.), Les bassins du Rhin et du Danube au Paléolithique supérieur: Environnement, habitat et systèmes d’échange, 28–44. Liège. E.R.A.U.L. 43.
Szederkényi, T., Kovács, S., Haas, J. and Nagymarosy, A. 2012. Geology and history of evolution of the ALCAPA Mega-Unit. In J. Haas (ed.), Geology of Hungary, 1–102. Heidelberg–New York–Dordrecht–London. Regional Geology Reviews.
Szekszárdi, A., Szakmány, Gy. and Biró, K. T. 2010. Tokaji-hegységi limnokvarcit-limnoopalit nyersanyagok és pattintott kőeszközök archeometriai vizsgálata. I.: Földtani viszonyok, petrográfia [Archaeometric analysis on limnic-quartzite limnic opalite raw materials and chipped stone tools, Tokaj Mts. NE-Hungary. I.: geological settings, petrography]. Archeometriai Műhely 7(1): 1–17.
Szepesi, J., Lukács, R., Biró, K. T., Markó, A, Pécskay, Z. and Harangi, Sz. 2018. Geology of Tokaj Mountains obsidians. Archeometriai Műhely 15(3): 167–180.
Szilágyi, K. 2018. Lithic raw material procurement in the Late Neolithic Southern Transdanubian region: A case study from the site of Alsónyék-Bátaszék. Archaeologia Polona 56: 127–140.
Szilágyi, V., Biró, K. T., Brandl, M., Harsányi, I., Maróti, B. and Kasztovszky, Zs. 2020. A kárpát-medencei radiolarit nyersanyagok szöveti típusai és geokémiai jellegei [Fabric types and geochemistry of radiolarite raw materials in the Carpathian basin]. Archeometriai Műhely 17(1): 1–29.
Szilasi, A. B. 2017. Radiolarite sources from the Bakony mountains: new research. Archaeologia Polona 55: 243–265.
Szolyák, P. 2019–2020. Reconsidering of the Palaeolithic assemblage of 12–14 Molotov Street, Miskolc, Hungary (1959). Praehistoria New Series 1–2(11–12): 43–76.
Szolyák, P. and Lengyel, Gy. 2014. A Miskolc–Bársony-házi „szakócák” kutatástörténete és techno-
-tipológiai vizsgálata [Research history and lithic techno-typology of the bifacial tools of Bársony’s house, Miskolc, Hungary]. A Herman Ottó Múzeum Évkönyve 53: 11–40.
Tixier, J. 2012. A method for the study of stone tools / Méthodes pour l’étude des outillages lithiques. Luxembourg. ArchéoLogiques 4.
Turq, A. 2000. Le Paléolithique inférieur et moyen entre Dordogne et Lot. Les Eyzies. Paléo – Supplément 2.
Turq, A. 2005. Réflexions méthodologiques sur les études de matières premières lithiques. Paléo 17: 111–132.
Vendl, A. 1940. Das Gesteinsmaterial der Paläolithe. In L. Bartucz, J. Dancza, F. Hollendonner, O. Kadić, M. Mottl, V. Pataki, E. Pálosi, J. Szabó and A. Vendl (eds), Die Mussolini-Höhle (Subalyuk) bei Cserépfalu, 169–199. Budapest. Geologica Hungarica Series Palaeontologica 14.
Vértes, L. 1951. Mesolititcheskiye nakhodki na verchinie gory Kioporoch pri g. Eger, Vengriya [Diemesolithische Fundstätte von Eger]. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 1: 153–190.
Vértes, L. and Tóth, L. 1963. Der Gebrauch des glasigen Quarzporphyrs im Paläolithikum des Bükk-
-Gebirges. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 15: 3–10.
Whallon, R. 2006. Social networks and information: non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25: 259–270.
Williams-Thorpe, O., Warren, S. E. and Nandris, J. G. 1984. The distribution and provenance of archaeological obsidian in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 11: 183–212.
Zandler, K. 2012. A paleolitikum kőiparai Eger környékén. Gesta 11: 3–54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Archaeologia Polona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I declare that the manuscript sent is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors mentioned and that there are no other persons who would meet the criteria for authorship but were not mentioned. In addition, I confirm that the order of the authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all the authors.
I confirm that the correspondent author is the only contact with the Editorial Board in the editorial process, and is responsible for communicating with other authors and informing them about the progress, corrections and final approval of the article.
