Reflectance spectroscopy as a chert sourcing method

Ryan M. Parish

Published: 2016-01-01

Vol. 54 (2016)

Reflectance spectroscopy as a chert sourcing method

Ryan M. Parish

Abstract

The non-destructive application of reflectance spectroscopy within chert provenance studies is evaluated and the implications of archaeological source determination of chert artifacts are discussed. The combined use of Visible Near-infrared (VNIR) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) reflectance spectroscopy demonstrate the accurate, fast and relatively low cost for the characterization of geological deposits of chert and the potential identification of source for chert archaeological materials. Reflectance spectroscopy gathers data on the trace and minor mineral components within a sample as identified by subtle absorption peaks and slope changes. The variable range of spectral features per sample, per deposit, per geological formation is potentially diagnostic for a geographically isolated deposit of chert. A chert sample database consisting of 2430 samples from the Midwestern and Southeastern United States is utilized to illustrate the accuracy of reflectance spectroscopy at characterizing chert deposits for archaeological use.

Keywords:

reflectance spectroscopy, chert, provenance research, Southeastern United States, Visible Near-infrared (VNIR), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Ryan M. Parish, Dagmara H. Werra, Characterizing “Chocolate” Flint Using Reflectance Spectroscopy , Archaeologia Polona: Vol. 56 (2018): Characteristics and Distribution of Siliceous Rocks in Prehistory

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Parish, R. M. (2016). Reflectance spectroscopy as a chert sourcing method. Archaeologia Polona, 54, 115–128. Retrieved from https://journals.iaepan.pl/apolona/article/view/433

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Beck, C.W., Wilbur, E., Meret, S., Kossove, D. and Kermani, K. 1965. The Infrared Spectra of Amber and the Identification of Baltic Amber. Archaeometry 8: 96–109.
Calogero, B.L.A. 1991. Macroscopic and Petrographic Identification of the Rock Types Used for Stone Tools in Central Connecticut. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut. Calogero, B.L.A. 1992. Lithic Misidentification. Man in the Northeast 43: 87–90.
Church, T. 1994. Lithic Resources Studies: A Sourcebook for Archaeologists. Tulsa. Special Publication No. 3. Lithic Technology. Department of Anthropology, University of Tulsa.
Crandell, O. 2006. Macroscopic and Microscopic Analysis of Chert. A Proposal for Standardization of Methodology and Terminology. Buletinul Cercurilor Stiintifice Studentesti 12: 7–30.
Emerson, T.E., Farnsworth, K.B., Wisseman, S.U. and Hughes, R.E. 2013. The Allure of the Exotic: Reexamining the Use of Local and Distant Pipestone Quarries in Ohio Hopewell Pipe Caches. American Antiquity 78: 48–67.
Foradas, J.G. 2003. Chemical Sourcing of Hopewell Bladelets: Implications for Building a Chert Database for Ohio. In P.N. Kardulias and R.W. Yerkes (eds), Written in Stone: The Multiple Dimensions of Lithic Analysis, 87–112. Lanham, Lexington Books.
Frahm, E. 2012. Evaluation of Archaeological Sourcing Techniques: Reconsidering and Re-deriving Hughes’ Four-Fold Assessment Scheme. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 27: 166–174.
Harbottle, G. 1982 Chemical Characterization in Archaeology. In J.E. Ericson and T.K. Earle (eds), Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, 13–51. New York, Academic Press.
Hassler, E., Swihart, G.H., Dye, D.H. and Sing Li,Y. 2013. Non-Destructive Provenance Study of Chert Using Infrared Reflectance Microscpectroscopy. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 2001–2006.
Hawkins, A.L., Tourigny, E., Long, D.G.F., Julig, P.J. and Bursey, J. 2008. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of Geological and Archaeological Chert from Southern Ontario. North American Archaeologist 29: 203–224.
Hubbard, M.J. 2006. Soapstone Vessels in the Ohio River Valley and Determining their Source of Origin Using Visible/Near-infrared Reflectance Spectrometry. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Kent State University, Kent.
Hubbard, M.J., Waugh, D.A. and Ortiz, J.D. 2005. Provenance Determination of Archaeological Cherts by VIS/NIR Diffuse Reflectance Spectrometry. The Compass 78: 119–129.
Long, D.F., Silveria, B. and Julig, P. 2001. Chert Analysis by Infrared Spectroscopy. A collection of papers presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Canadian Archaeological Association. Ontario, Ontario Archaeological Society.
Luedtke, B.E. 1979. The Identification of Sources of Chert Artifacts. American Antiquity 44: 744–756.
Malyk-Selivanova, N. 1998. Geological-Geochemical Approach to ‘Sourcing’ of Prehistoric Chert Artifacts, Northwestern Alaska. Geoarchaeology 13: 673–708.
Morin, J. 2012. The Political Economy of stone Celt Exchange in Pre-contact British Columbia: The Salish Nephrite/Jade Industry. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Nance, J.D. 2000. Elemental Composition Studies of Lithic Materials from Western Kentucky. Midcontinent Journal of Archaeology 26: 83–100.
Parish, R.M. 2011. The Application of Visible/Near-Infrared Reflectance (VNIR) Spectroscopy to Chert: A Case Study from the Dover Quarry Sites, Tennessee. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 26: 420–439.
Parish, R.M. 2013. The Application of Reflectance Spectroscopy to Chert Provenance of Mississippian Symbolic Weaponry.Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis.
Parish, R.M., Swihart, G.H. and Sing Li,Y. 2013. Evaluating Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a Non-destructive Chert Sourcing Technique. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 28: 289–307.
Smith, B.C. 2011. Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. New York, CRC Press. Google Scholar