On the polysemic nature of traces and co-occurring patterns in anthropized material — contribution of a “Retoucher” with a flaked bone aspect from Roc-en-Pail (France)

Éva David

doi:10.23858/SA/76.2024.1.3645

Published: 2024-10-14

Vol. 76 No. 1 (2024)

On the polysemic nature of traces and co-occurring patterns in anthropized material — contribution of a “Retoucher” with a flaked bone aspect from Roc-en-Pail (France)

Éva David

Sprawozdania Archeologiczne

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.23858/SA/76.2024.1.3645

Abstract

This article presents a new archaeological material to discuss methodological issues encountered by scientists working both on minimally-modified bones from Mousterian assemblages, to those dealing with the identification of “retouchers” having a flaked bone aspect. The technological approach integrates complementary analytical study-frames in order to assess archaeological information. On the one hand, analogies with similar experimentally produced patterns reduce the functional identification of the archaeological specimen. They do not deal with a single artefact-type in the category of “retouchers”, which thus remains generic. On the other hand, the recording of the patterns in their chronological order, combined together with that of modifications relative to the diagenesis of the bone as an artefact, suggests the “retoucher” was reduced in a relatively fresh state by a carnivorous predator also. The evidence of this co-occurrence, if characterizing the successive anthropic-originated bone beds ultimately degraded by predators in situ, would suggest a relatively short period of human occupation generated by the use of the site in a singular cyclical conception “prey-hunter-predator” at regional scale.

Keywords:

Mousterian, retouch, flake, puncture, percussion, pattern, temporality

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Jacek Kabaciński, Iwona Sobkowiak-Tabaka, Éva David, Marta Osypińska, Thomas Terberger, Małgorzata Winiarska-Kabacińska, The chronology of T-shaped axes in the Polish Lowland = Chronologia toporów T-kształtnych na Niżu Polskim , Sprawozdania Archeologiczne: Vol. 66 (2014)

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

David, Éva. (2024). On the polysemic nature of traces and co-occurring patterns in anthropized material — contribution of a “Retoucher” with a flaked bone aspect from Roc-en-Pail (France). Sprawozdania Archeologiczne, 76(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.23858/SA/76.2024.1.3645

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Abrams Gr., Bello S. M., Bonjean D., Di Modica K., Otte M. and Pirson St. 2014. Les retouchoirs en os de l’ensemble sédimentaire 5 de Scladina: utilisation des restes d’ours des cavernes. Notae Praehistoricae 34, 5-19.
Google Scholar

Armand D. and Delagnes A. 1998. Les retouchoirs en os d’Artenac (couche 6c): Perspectives archéozoologiques, taphonomiques et expérimentales. In J.-Ph. Brugal, L. Meignen and M. Patou-Mathis (eds), Economie préhistorique: Les comportements de subsistance au Paléolithique, Actes des XVIIIe Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes, 23-25 Octobre 1997. Sophia-Antipolis: APDCA, 205-214.
Google Scholar

Baudouin M. Dr. 1906. Discussion sur l’usage de l’os comme outil à l’époque moustérienne. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 3, 189-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1906.11464
Google Scholar

Baumann M., Plisson H., Rendu W., Maury S., Kolobova K. and Krivoshapin A. 2020. The Neandertal bone industry at Chagyrskaya Cave, Altai Region, Russia. Quaternary International 559, 68-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.06.019
Google Scholar

Baumann M., Plisson H., Maury S., Renou S., Coqueugniot H., Vanderesse N., Kolobova K., Shnaider S., Rots V., Guérin G. and Rendu W. 2023. On the Quina side: A Neanderthal bone industry at Chez-Pinaud site, France. PLoS ONE 18(6), e0284081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284081
Google Scholar

Bello S.M. and Parfitt S.A. 2023. Taphonomic approaches to distinguish chewing damage from knapping marks in Palaeolithic faunal assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 51, 104183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104183
Google Scholar

Bertran P., Todisco D., Bordes J.-G., Discamps E. and Vallin L. 2019. Perturbation assessment in archaeological sites as part of the taphonomic study: a review of methods used to document the impact of natural processes on site formation and archaeological interpretations. PALEO 30/1, 52-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.4378
Google Scholar

Binford L. 1981. Bones, ancient men and modern myths. London/New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Blasco R., Rosell J., Cuartero F., Fernández Peris J., Gopher A. and Barkai R. 2013. Using bones to shape stones: MIS 9 bone retouchers at both edges of the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE 8/10, e76780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076780
Google Scholar

Burke Ch. C. 2018. North American Great Plains bison bonebeds: Exploring human impacts to scavenging carnivores through carnivore utilization taphonomy. In K. E. Krasinski, Ch. C. Burke and K. E. Graf (eds.), From taphonomy to Human paleoecology: A commemorative issue celebrating the career of Gary Haynes, INQUA-HABCOM President from 2003-2011. Amsterdam: Quaternary International (466-B), 223-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.03.023
Google Scholar

Castel J.-Ch., Chauvière Fr.-X. and Madelaine St. 2003. Sur os et sur dents: Les «retouchoirs» aurignaciens de la Ferrassie (Savignac-de-Miremont, Dordogne). PALEO 15, 29-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.1212
Google Scholar

Chase Ph. G. 1990. Tool-making tools and Middle Paleolithic behavior. Current Anthropology 31/4, 443-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/203869
Google Scholar

Child A. M. 1995. Microbial taphonomy of archaeological bone. Studies in conservation 40/1, 19-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1995.40.1.19
Google Scholar

Courtenay L. A., Herranz-Rodrigo D., Huguet R., Maté-González, González-Aguilera D. and Yravedra J. 2020. Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy. PLoS ONE 15(10), e0240328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240328
Google Scholar

Daujeard C., Moncel M.-H., Fiore I., Tagliacozzo A., Bindon P. and Raynal J.-P. 2014. Middle Palaeolithic bone retouchers in Southeastern France. Variability and functionality. In A. Nadachowski and Kr. J. Cyrek (eds), European Middle Palaeolithic (MIS 8-MIS 3): Cultures, environment, chronology. Amsterdam: Quaternary International (326-327), 492-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.12.022
Google Scholar

Daujeard C., Valensi P., Fiore I., Moigne A.-M., Tagliacozzo A., Moncel M.-H., Santagata C., Cauche D. and Raynal J.-P. 2018. A reappraisal of lower to Middle Palaeolithic bone retouchers from southeastern France. In J. M. Hutson, A. García-Moreno, E. S. Noack A. Villaluenga and S. Gaudzinski-Windheuser (eds), The origins of bone tool technologies: “Retouching the Palaeolithic: Becoming Human and the origins of bone tool technology” Conference at Schloss Herrenhausen in Hannover, Germany, 21-23 Oktober 2015. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 93-132.
Google Scholar

David É. 2007. Technology on bone and antler industries: a relevant methodology for characterizing early Post-Glacial societies (9th-8th millennium BC). In C. Gates St.-Pierre and R. Walker (eds), Bones as tools: current methods and interpretations in worked bone studies (= British Archaeological Reports — International Series 1622). Oxford: Archaeopress, 35-50.
Google Scholar

David É. and Ducrocq Th. 2023. The biography of decorated antler adzes from Montières (France) suggests a magic function in Mesolithic art. In J. M. Grünberg, B. Gramsch, E. Brinch Petersen, Th. Płonka and H. Meller (eds), Mesolithic Art – Abstraction, Decoration, Messages. International and interdisciplinary Conference Halle (Saale), Germany, 19th-21st September 2019. Halle: Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte (Band 26-1), 41-54.
Google Scholar

David É. and Gargani E. 2018. À la recherche des os anthropisé de Roc-en-Pail (Maine-et-Loire). Rapport d’expertise préliminaire. In S. Soriano (ed.), Fouille programmée pluriannuelle (FPP) Roc-en-Pail (Chalonnes-sur-Loire, 49). Opération n°185995. Second rapport de fouille intermédiaire. Exercice 2017 de la programmation triennale 2016-2018. Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication DRAC Pays-de-la-Loire / Service régional de l’Archéologie, 85-143.
Google Scholar

David É. and Pelegrin J. 2009. Possible Late Glacial bone “retouchers” in the Baltic Mesolithic: The contribution of experimental tests with lithics on bone tools. In M. Street, R. N. E. Barton and Th. Terberger (eds), Humans, environment and chronology of the Late Glacial of the North European Plain. Proceedings of workshop 14 (Commission XXXII) of the XVth Congrès de l’Union internationale des sciences pré- et protohistoriques UISPP, Lisboa, 4th-9th of September 2006 (= Tagungsbänder 6). Mainz: Verlag der Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 155‑168.
Google Scholar

David É. and Valentin Eriksen B. 2021. Antler tool’s biography shortens time frame of Lyngby-axes to the last stage of the Late-Glacial. In S. Gaudzinski-Windheuser and O. Jöris (eds), The beef behind all possible pasts. The tandem festschrift in honour Elaine Turner and Martin Street (= Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 157). Mainz: Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 639-656.
Google Scholar

David É., Sørensen M., Diemer S., Santaniello F. and Vatsvåg Nielsen S. 2023(a). Maglemosian in contact: The disruptive invention of stone pressure flaking on the curve crutch 7000 CAL BC. In É. David and E. Hrnčiarik (eds), Contact, circulation, exchange. Proceedings of the Modified Bone & Shell UISPP Commission Conference (2-3 March 2017, University of Trnava) (= Industrie de l’os préhistorique 15). Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology, 52-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.14638126.7
Google Scholar

David É., Fernandes P., Fjellström M. and Eriksson G. 2023(b). Prémices à une anthropologie philosophique et pragmatique sur le geste mortuaire en préhistoire – Cas d’un ancien lot, ici daté, d’os humains artéfactualisés du mas d’Azil (France). In É. David, H. Forestier and S. Soriano (eds), De la préhistoire à l’anthropologie philosophique — Recueil de textes offert à Eric Boëda (= Anthropologie des techniques Cahier 6). Paris: l’Harmattan, 343-390.
Google Scholar

Diedrich C. J. 2015. ‘Neanderthal bone flutes’: simply products of Ice Age spotted hyena scavenging activities on cave bear cubs in European cave bear dens. Royal Society Open Science 2, 140022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140022
Google Scholar

Domínguez-Rodrigo M., Pickering Tr. and Bunn H. T. 2010. Configurational approach to identifying the earliest hominin butchers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107/49, 20929-20934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013711107
Google Scholar

Doyon L., Li Z., Li H. and d’Errico Fr. 2018. Discovery of circa 115,000-year-old bone retouchers at Lingjing, Henan, China. PLoS ONE 13(3), e0194318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194318
Google Scholar

d’Errico Fr. and Henshilwood C. 2007. Additional evidence for bone technology in the southern African Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution 52, 142-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.08.003
Google Scholar

d’Errico Fr., Zilhão J., Julien M., Baffier D. and Pelegrin J. 1998. Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation. Current Anthropology 39, 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204689
Google Scholar

Farizy C., David F. and Jaubert J. (ed.) 1994. Hommes et bisons du Paléolithique moyen à Mauran, Haute Garonne. Paris: Gallia préhistoire (XXXe supplément).
Google Scholar

Fernández-Jalvo Y. and Andrews P. 2016. Atlas of taphonomic identifications. 1001+ Images of fossil and recent mammal bone modification. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7432-1
Google Scholar

Haynes G. 1983. Frequencies of spiral and green-bone fractures on ungulate limb bones in modern surface assemblages. American Antiquity 48, 102-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/279822
Google Scholar

Henri-Martin L. 1906. Maillets ou enclumes en os provenant de la couche moustérienne de la Quina (Charente). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 3, 155-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1906.11456
Google Scholar

Henri-Martin L. 1907. Recherches sur l’évolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de La Quina (Charente). Premier volume, Industrie osseuse. Paris: Schleicher (1907-1910).
Google Scholar

Holen St. R. and Holen K. A. 2011. Evidence for a Human occupation of the North American Great Plains during the Late Glacial Maximum. In J. López, C. Serrano Sánchez, A. Gonzáles Gonzáles and F. J. Aguilar Arellano (eds), IV Symposio Internacional El hombre temprano en America. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma/Museo del Desierto, 85-105.
Google Scholar

Hutson J. M., García-Moreno A., Noack E. S., Villaluenga A. and Gaudzinski-Windheuser S. (eds) 2018. The origins of bone tool technologies: “Retouching the Palaeolithic: Becoming Human and the origins of bone tool technology” Conference at Schloss Herrenhausen in Hannover, Germany, 21-23 Oktober 2015. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums.
Google Scholar

Lakovleva L., Djindjian Fr., Moigne A.-M., Mashenko E., Konik St., Matviichina J., Grégoire S. and Sapojnikova G. 2018. Gontsy (Ukraine), a settlement with Mammoth bone dwellings of the Late Upper Palaeolithic in Eastern Europe. UISPP journal 1(1), 42-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62526/G6YD4I
Google Scholar

Langlais M., Pétillon J.-M., A. de Beaune S., Cattelain P., Chauvière Fr.-X., Letourneux Cl., Szmidt C., Bellier Cl., Beukens R. and David Fr. 2010. Une occupation de la fin du dernier maximum glaciaire dans les Pyrénnées: Le Magdalénien inférieur de la grotte des Scilles (Lespugue, Haute-Garonne). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 107, 5-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2010.13909
Google Scholar

Madgwick R. 2014. What makes bones shiny? Investigating trampling as a cause of bone abrasion. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6, 163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-013-0165-0
Google Scholar

Mallye J. B., Thiébaut C., Mourre V., Costamagno S., Claud É. and Weisbecker P. 2012. The Mousterian bone retouchers of Noisetier Cave: experimentation and identification of marks. Journal of Archaeological Science 39, 1131-1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.12.018
Google Scholar

Maté-González M. Á., González-Aguilera D., Linares-Matás G. and Yravedra J. 2019. New technologies applied to modelling taphonomic alterations. In J. Yravedra Sainz de los Terreros, M. Á.
Google Scholar

Maté-González, L. A. Courtenay and J. Aramendi-Picado (eds), Taphonomic new technologies. Amsterdam. Quaternary international 517, 4-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.12.021
Google Scholar

Mateo-Lomba P., Rivals Fl. and Blasco R. 2019. The use of bones as retouchers at Unit III of Teixoneres Cave (MIS 3; Moià, Barcelona, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 27, 101980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.101980
Google Scholar

Parfitt S. A. and Bello S. M. 2024. Bone tools, carnivore chewing and heavy percussion: assessing conflicting interpretations of Lower and Upper Palaeolithic bone assemblages. Royal Society Open Science 11, 231163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231163
Google Scholar

Parfitt S. A., Lewis M. D. and Bello S. M. 2022. Taphonomic and technological analyses of Lower Palaeolithic bone tools from Clacton-on-Sea, UK. Scientific Reports 12, 20222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23989-x
Google Scholar

Patou-Mathis M. (ed.) 2002. Retouchoirs, compresseurs, percuteurs… Os à impressions et éraillures (= Fiches de la Commission de nomenclature sur l’industrie de l’os préhistorique – Cahier X). Paris: Société préhistorique française.
Google Scholar

Richard M., Pons-Branchu Ed., Genuite K., Jaillet St., Joannes-Boyau R., Wang N., Genty D., Cheng H., Price G. and Pierre M. 2021. Timing of neanderthal occupations in the southern margins of the Massif central (France): A multi-method approach. Quaternary Science Reviews 273, 107241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107241
Google Scholar

Romagnoli Fr., Baena J., Pardo Naranjo A. I. and Sarti L. 2017. Evaluating the performance of the cutting edge of Neanderthal shell tools: A new experimental approach. Use, mode of operation, and strength of Callista chione from a behavioural, Quina perspective. In A. Jerardino, P. Faulkner and C. Flores (eds), Current methodological issues in archaeomalacological studies. Amsterdam: Quaternary international (427-A), 216-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.021
Google Scholar

Schiffer M. B. 1983. Towards the identification of formation processes. American Antiquity 48/4, 675-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/279771
Google Scholar

Schwab C. and Rigaud A. 2009. Les «os à impressions et à éraillures»: premiers résultats expérimentaux. Antiquités nationales 40, 29-37.
Google Scholar

Shipman P. 2001. What can you do with a bone fragment? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98/4, 1335-1337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.4.1335
Google Scholar

Soriano S., Ahmed-Delacroix N., Borvon A., Chevrier B., David É., Dessoles M., Elalouf J.-M., Faivre J.-P., Forré P., Guérin G., Lahaye C., Lebreton L., Lhomme V., Massoulié M., Mellier B., Primault J., Rasse M., Sévêque N., Todisco D., Utge J., Verna C. and Voeltzel B. 2021. Le site de Roc-en-Pail (Chalonnes-sur-Loire, Maine-et-Loire). État des connaissances 150 ans après sa découverte. Gallia préhistoire 61, 55-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/galliap.2633
Google Scholar

Stiner M. C. 2004. Comparative ecology and taphonomy of spotted hyenas, humans and, wolves in Pleistocene Italy. Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève 23/2, 771-785.
Google Scholar

Tartar E. 2012. Réflexion autour de la fonction des retouchoirs en os de l’Aurignacien ancien. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 109/1, 69-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2012.14143
Google Scholar

Thiébault C., Claud É and Costamagno S. (eds) 2019. L’acquisition et le traitement des matières végétales et animales par les néandertaliens: quelles modalités et quelles stratégies? Paris: Presses universitaires du Midi (P@lethnologie 10, 3548).
Google Scholar

Toth N. and Woods M. 1989. Molluscan shell knives and experimental cut-marks on bones. Journal of Field Archaeology 16, 250-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.1989.16.2.250
Google Scholar

Turner E., Humphrey L., Bouzouggar A. and Barton N. 2020. Bone retouchers and technological continuity in the Middle Stone Age of North Africa. PLoS ONE 15/3, e0230642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230642
Google Scholar

Vettese D. and Daujeard C. 2021. The myth of the bone retoucher: analysis of an experimental remain. In Colloque en hommage à Émilie Campmas, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Sociétés humaines et environnements dans la zone circum méditerranéenne du Pléistocène au début de l’Holocène, 8-9 mars 2021. Poster available, the 28/02/2024, at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349946933_The_myth_of_the_bone_retoucher_analysis_of_an_experimental_remain
Google Scholar

Vettese D., Blasco R., Cáceres I., Gaudzinski-Windheuser S., Moncel M.-H., Thun Hohenstein U. and Daujeard C. 2020. Towards an understanding of Hominin marrow extraction strategies: a proposal for a percussion mark terminology. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 12/2, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00972-8
Google Scholar

Villa P. and Bartram L. 1996. Flaked bone from a hyena den. PALEO 8, 143-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1996.910
Google Scholar

Villa P., Boshian G., Pollarolo L., Saccà D., Marra F., Nomade S. and Pereira A. 2021. Elephant bones for the Middle Pleistocene toolmaker. PLoS ONE 16/8, e0256090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256090
Google Scholar

Vincent A. 1988. L’os comme artefact au Paléolithique moyen: Principes d’étude et premiers résultats. In L. Binford and J.-Ph. Rigaud (eds), L’Homme de Neandertal, La technique (volume 4), Actes du Colloque International de Liège, 4-7 Décembre 1986. Liège: ERAUL (31), 185-196.
Google Scholar

Vincent A. 1993. L’outillage osseux au Paléolithique moyen: Une nouvelle approche. Nanterre: University Paris X (Unpublished PhD).
Google Scholar