The symbolism of the Lycurgus Cup
Keywords:
Lycurgus, Dionysus, vase painting, mosaics, glassAbstract
The Rothschild Lycurgus Cup from the 4th c. AD is one of the most renowned masterpieces of late Roman glass workmanship. It represents a type referred to as ‘cage cups’ (diatreta) and belongs to a rare group of dichroic glass. It depicts the punishment of king Lycurgus for his hubris against Dionysus. The focus of the paper is on the iconography of the decoration and its symbolism. The frieze on the Lycurgus Cup is compared to other representations of the myth on ancient vases and mosaics in order to get a broader view of the theme. Moreover, the paper introduces a different interpretation related to a possible other usage of the cup
Downloads
References
Bruneau, P. 1966. Lycurgue et Ambrosia sur une nouvelle mosaïque de Délos, Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 90 (2): 391–427
Chirnside, D. 1965. The Rothschild Lycurgus cup: an analytical investigation. In Proceedings of the 7thInternational Congress on Glass, Comptes Rendus 2, Brussels, 1–6
Elsner, J. 2013. The Lycurgus cup. In Ch. Entwistle and L. James (eds), New Light on Old Glass: Recent Research on Byzantine Mosaics and Glass, 103–111, London
Grassigli, G. 1995. L’iconografia di Licurgo. Iniziazione e trionfo Dionysiaco, Ostraka 4: 229–248
Griffith, J.G. 1983. The Myth of Lycurgus, King of the Edodian Thracians, in Literature and Art, Ancient Bulgaria 1: 217–232
Grift van de, J. 1984. De Lycurgo Insano: The Dionysiac Frieze on a Silver Kantharos, The Journal of the Walters Art Gallery: 6–15
Harden, D.B. 1963. The Rothschild Lycurgus cup: addenda and corrigenda, Journal of Glass Studies 5: 9–17
Harden, D.B. (ed.) 1987. Glass of the Caesars, Milan
Harden, D.B. and Toynbee J.M.C. 1959. The Rothschild Lycurgus cup, Archaeologia 97: 179–212
Henig, M. 2002. The Art of Roman Britain: New in Paperback, Routledge
Hordern, J.H. 2002. The fragments of Timotheus of Miletus, Oxford
Key Fowden, E. 2006. Constantine and the people of the Eastern frontier. In N.E. Lenski (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Age of Constantine, Cambridge, 377–399
Koster, A. and Whitehouse D. 1989. Early Roman cage cups, Journal of Glass Studies 31: 25–33
LIMC: Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae VI, 1992, Zürich
Magie, D. 1932. The scriptores Historiae Augustae 3, London
Matz, F. 1968. Die dionysischen Sarkophage, Berlin
Olson, S.D. 2007. Broken laughter select fragments of Greek comedy, Oxford
Quinten, M. 2011. Optical Properties of Nanoparticle Systems Mie and Beyond, Weinheim
Scott, G. D. 1995. A study of the Lycurgus cup, Journal of Glass Studies 37: 51–64
Segal, C. 1982. Dionysiac poetics and Euripides’ Bacchae, Princeton
Stern, E.M. 2011. A new window on ancient glass technology, including cameo glass and cage cup, Journal of Roman Archaeology 24: 619–626
Stuligrosz, M. 2011. Dionysiac elements in Philoxenus’ Banquet. In S. Ruciński, C. Balbuza and C. Królczyk (eds), Studia Lesco Mrozewicz, Poznań, 399–410
Tchernia, A. and Brun, J.P. 1999. Le vin romain antique, Glénat
Whitehouse, D. 1989. Roman dichroic glass: two contemporary descriptions?, Journal of Glass Studies 31: 119–121
Zanker, P. and Ewald B.C. 2012. Living with myths: the imagery of Roman Sarcophagi, Oxford–New York
Zografou, A. 2010. Magic Lamps, Luminous Dreams: Lamps in PGM Recipes. In M. Christopoulos, E.D. Karakantza and O. Levaniouk (eds), Light and darkness in ancient Greek myth and religion, Lanham, 269–294
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
I declare that the manuscript sent is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors mentioned and that there are no other persons who would meet the criteria for authorship but were not mentioned. In addition, I confirm that the order of the authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all the authors.
I confirm that the correspondent author is the only contact with the Editorial Board in the editorial process, and is responsible for communicating with other authors and informing them about the progress, corrections and final approval of the article.