Geochemical and magnetic prospection of a Neolithic site: case study from Dzielnica (Poland)

Authors

  • Mirosław Furmanek
  • Krzysztof Gediga
  • Urszula Piszcz
  • Artur Rapiński

Keywords:

geochemical prospection, magnetic prospection, phosphate analysis, Neolithic, enclosure

Abstract

No

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lindholm, K. J. 2006. Wells of Experience. A pastoral land-use history of Omaheke, Namibi, Uppsala
Parnell, J. J, Terry, R. E. and Nelson, Z. 2002. Soil Chemical Analysis Applied as an Interpretive Tool for Ancient Human Activities Piedras Negras, Guatemala, Journal of Archaeological Science 29, 379–404
Persson, K. 2005. Integrated Geophysical-Geochemical Methods for Archaeological Prospecting, Stockholm
Rypkemaa, H. A., Lee, W. E., Galaty, M. L. and Haws, J., 2007. Rapid, in-stride soil phosphate measurement in archaeological survey: a new method tested in Loudoun County, Virginia, Journal of Archaeological Science 34, 1859-1867

Downloads

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Furmanek, M. ., Gediga, K. ., Piszcz, U., & Rapiński, A. (2015). Geochemical and magnetic prospection of a Neolithic site: case study from Dzielnica (Poland). Archaeologia Polona, 53, 452–455. Retrieved from https://journals.iaepan.pl/apolona/article/view/373

Issue

Vol. 53 (2015): Archaeological Prospection

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

I declare that the manuscript sent is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors mentioned and that there are no other persons who would meet the criteria for authorship but were not mentioned. In addition, I confirm that the order of the authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all the authors.
I confirm that the correspondent author is the only contact with the Editorial Board in the editorial process, and is responsible for communicating with other authors and informing them about the progress, corrections and final approval of the article.