Born in the body of beasts. Animals and the social order in didactic Buddhist literature of Buryat-Mongols (XIX- beg. XX century)

Ayur Zhanaev

doi:10.23858/ethp.2020.41.2012

Opublikowane: 2020-12-18

Tom 41 (2020)

Born in the body of beasts. Animals and the social order in didactic Buddhist literature of Buryat-Mongols (XIX- beg. XX century)

Ayur Zhanaev

Ethnologia Polona

Dział: Varia

https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2020.41.2012

Abstrakt

This paper engages with current discussions concerning the ways in which human cultures construct the sphere labelled as “social” against that of the broadly defined environment. I contribute to these discussions with an analysis of the didactic Buddhist literature of Buryat-Mongols (19th–beg. 20th century), focusing on the image of non-human animals and their position in the social/universal order. With the emergence of environmentalist trends in the humanities, pre-modern/“non-Western” inter-species relationships have often served as counter-alternatives to the problematic “Western” nature-culture dichotomy. While expecting to see the human being described as a part of “nature” in the analyzed texts, I found a different picture: the anthropocentric social sphere is clearly distinguished from animals, and in some fragments, the idioms used with regard to animals are reminiscent of European evolutionist discourse. Through an exhaustive analysis of Buryat attitudes towards animals is beyond the scope of this study, this literature gives insight into a particular cultural discourse as represented in reputed sources of the period.

Słowa kluczowe:

animals, social order, environment, Buryat-Mongols, Buddhism

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Ewa Nowicka, Ayur Zhanaev, Life on the Borderland: Buryats in Russia, Mongolia and China , Ethnologia Polona: Tom 37 (2016): Ethnologia Polona: HIMALAYAN AND TIBETAN IDENTITIES IN CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVE

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Zhanaev, A. (2020). Born in the body of beasts. Animals and the social order in didactic Buddhist literature of Buryat-Mongols (XIX- beg. XX century) . Ethnologia Polona, 41. https://doi.org/10.23858/ethp.2020.41.2012

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Badmaev, Andrey. 2008. “Bear cult relics of the Buriatian culture.” Bulletin of the Hokkaido University Museum 4.
Google Scholar

Bartsow, Geoffrey. 2019. “On the moral standing of animals in Tibetan Buddhism.” Études mongoles et sibériennes, centrasiatiques et tibétaines 50. http://journals.openedition.org/emscat/3865 (accessed 29.03.2020).
Google Scholar

Belyaeva-Sachuk, Veronika. 2020. “Zhivotnye v traditsionnoi kul’ture okinskikh buryat i soyotov. Istochnik pishchi, rabotnik, drug ili sakral’noe sushchestvo?” Kunstkamera 1 (7). http://journal.kunstkamera.ru/archive/2020_01/belyaevasachuk_v_a_zhivotnye_v_tradicionnoj_kulture_okinskih_buryat_i_sojotov_istochnik_piwi_rabotnik_drug_ili_sakralnoe_suwestv (accessed 30.03.2020).
Google Scholar

Chimitdorzhiev, Shirab, and Taras Mikhailov eds. 1994.Vydaiushchiesia buryatskie deiateli. Ulan-Ude: Belig.
Google Scholar

Dashiev, Dandar. 1997. Buryatskaia didakticheskaia literatura: problem zhanrovogo sostava, PhD diss., Ulan Ude. http://cheloveknauka.com/buryatskaya-didakticheskaya-literatura-problemy-zhanrovogo-sostava#ixzz66C7plqLA (accessed 10.03.2020).
Google Scholar

Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Dondokova, Natalia. 2008. Zoosemicheskie frazeologizmy buriatskogo iazyka: struktura, semantika, funktsii, PhD diss., Ulan-Ude.
Google Scholar

Dorzhigushaeva, Oyuna. 2002. Ekologicheskaia etika buddizma, Saint-Petersburg: Karma Yeshe Paldron.
Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Humphrey, Caroline. 2016. “Placing self amid others: a Mongolian technique of comparison.” L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie 218, 151–181.
Google Scholar

Humphrey, Caroline, and Ujeed, Hürelbaatar. 2013. A Monastery in Time: The Making of Mongolian Buddhism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Kara, Györgi. 1972. Knigi mongol’skikh kochevnikov. Moscow: Nauka.
Google Scholar

Khurelbaatar. 1987. “Sviazi indijskoi, tibetskoi i mongolskoi didakticheskoi poezii.” In Aktualnye problemy sovremiennogo mongolovedenia, edited by S. Luvsanvandan, 287–292, Ulaanbaatar: Gosizdat.
Google Scholar

Kollmar-Paulenz, Karénina. 2001. Erdeni tunumal neretü sudur. Die Biographie des Altan qaγan der Tümed-Mongolen. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der religionspolitischen Beziehungen zwischen der Mongolei und Tibet im ausgehenden 16. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Google Scholar

Kollmar-Paulenz, Karénina. 2010. “Teaching the Dharma in pictures: illustrated Mongolian books of the Ernst Collection in Switzerland”. In The Arts of Tibetan Painting Recent Research on Manuscripts, Murals and Thangkas of Tibet, the Himalayas and Mongolia (11th–19th century). edited by Amy Heller https://www.asianart.com/articles/paulenz/index.html (accessed 05.03.2020).
Google Scholar

Kollmar-Paulenz, Karénina. 2014. “Systematically ordering the world: the encounter of Buriyad-Mongolian, Tibetan and Russian knowledge cultures in the 19th century.” Etudes de lettres 2–3, 123–146.
Google Scholar

Kollmar-Paulenz, Karénina. 2017. “The Fear of being reborn in the hells: death and the afterlife in early twentieth-century Mongolia.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 167 (1), 167–191.
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 1981. “Wie ist soziale Ordnung möglich?.” In Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, vol. 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 195–285.
Google Scholar

Molly H. Mullin. 1999. “Mirrors and windows: sociocultural studies of human-animal relationships.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28, 201–224.
Google Scholar

Morokhoeva, Zoya. 1994. Lichnost’ v kulturakh Vostoka i Zapada.Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Google Scholar

Muzraeva, Delyash. 2013. Tibeto-Mongolskaia povestvovatel’naia literatura XVII–XVIII vv. (Perevodnye pis’miennye pamyatniki na mongol’skom i oiratskom iazykakh). Elista: Dzhangar.
Google Scholar

Pedersen, A. Morten. 2001. “Totemism, animism and North Asian indigenous ontologies.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(3), 411–427.
Google Scholar

Sazykin, Aleksei. 2004. Videniia Buddiiskogo Ada. Predislovie, perevod, transliteratsyia, primechaniia i glossarii. Saint-Petersburg: Nartang.
Google Scholar

Tangad, Oyungerel. 2013. Scheda po Czyngis Chanie: demokracja po mongolsku. Warsaw: Trio.
Google Scholar

Tangad, Oyungerel. 2016a. “Kategorie tradycyjnej moralności w życiu społecznym współczesnych Mongołów.” Zeszyty Etnologii Wrocławskiej 2(25), 111–127.
Google Scholar

Tangad, Oyungerel. 2016b. “Nieuchwytna, relatywna wszechobecność – o kategoriach moralności w kulturze mongolskiej.” Etnografia Polska LX, 129–147.
Google Scholar

Tsydenzhapov, Shirab-Nimbu. 1990. Frazeologizmy staropis’mennogo mongol’skogo iazyka. Ulan-Ude: Buriatskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
Google Scholar

Tsyrempilov, Nikolai. 2013. Buddizm i imperiia.Ulan-Ude: Buryaad-Mongol nom.
Google Scholar

Waldau, Paul. 2002. The Specter of Speciesism: Buddhist and Christian Views of Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

White, Thomas, and Candea, Matei. 2018. “Animals.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by F. Stein, S. Lazar, M. Candea, H. Diemberger, J. Robbins, A. Sanchez and R. Stasch https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/animals (accessed 09.03.2020).
Google Scholar

Wilson, Jeff. 2010. Samsāra and Rebirth, in Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Yakhontova, Natalia. 2019. “Tibetsko-mongol’skaia rukopis’ tematicheskogo slovaria iz sobraniia IVR RAN.” In Kul’turnoe nasledie mongolov: kollekcii rukopisei i arkhivnykh dokumentov. Sbornik dokladov III mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferencii. 20‒22 aprelia 2017 g., edited by S. Chuluun, 230–245, Saint-Petersburg – Ulaanbaatar 230–245. http://www.orientalstudies.ru/rus/images/pdf/add1/b_chuluun_ed_2019_23_yakhontova.pdf (accessed 09.03.2020).
Google Scholar

Yermakova, Tatiana, and Yelena Ostrovskaya. 2004. Klassicheskii Buddizm. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka klassika, Peterburgskoe Vostokoviedienie.
Google Scholar

Yumsunov, Vandan. 1935. “Qori-jin arban nigen ečige-jin ǯon-u uɣ iǯaɣur-un tuɣuǯi.” In Letopisi khorinskikh buryat, edited by N. Poppe, 53–172, Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo akademii nauk SSSR.
Google Scholar