The potential and limitations of geophysical measurements on archaeological sites partly investigated in the past: case studies from the Czech Republic
Keywords:
magnetometry, non-destructive archaeology, archaeological investigation, Neolithic roundel, hillfort, monasteryAbstract
No
Downloads
References
Křivánek, R., Frolík, J. and Musil, J. 2011. Geofyzikálni průzkum benediktinského kláštera v Podlažicich, okr. Chrudim. In E. Doležalová and P. Meduna (eds), Co můj kostel dnes má, nemůže kníže odníti. Věnováno Petru Sommerovi k životnímu jubileu, Prague, 129-137
Majer, A. 1995. The second stage: 1990-1993. In I. Pavlů, J. Rulf and M. Zápotocká (eds), Bylany rondel. Model of the neolitic site. Památky archeologické, Supplementum 3, Prague, 15-17
Šolle, M. 1977. Zkušenost a výsledky spolupráce přirodnich věd včetně geofyzikálních metod při archeologických výzkumech českých hradišť 8. – 12. stoleti. Geofyzikální prospekce v archeologii – 2. celoštátny seminár archeogeofyziky Nové Vozokazy 1976, Zprávy ČSSA při Česko-Slovenská Akadémia Vied, Ročník XIX (4-5), 95-96
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
I declare that the manuscript sent is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors mentioned and that there are no other persons who would meet the criteria for authorship but were not mentioned. In addition, I confirm that the order of the authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all the authors.
I confirm that the correspondent author is the only contact with the Editorial Board in the editorial process, and is responsible for communicating with other authors and informing them about the progress, corrections and final approval of the article.