far-right, Czech Republic, methodology, participant observation, pariah polotical parties


Protest politics, in its myriad forms, is something we have been witnessing globally with an ever-increasing frequency. While some might view it as the “purview” of political science, some researchers may wish to develop a more sophisticated understanding and then drawing on insights from other disciplines is extremely useful. Anthropology, with its historical background of studying phenomena outside the western setting, including protest movements (such as millennial movements), can provide an angle that political science might overlook or never consider. In addition, anthropology also has much to offer in terms of methodology. The contributions of ethnographic fieldwork, and participant observation in particular, are the focus of this article and my argument will in large part be based on my own original research, which centred on the members and sympathisers of the Czech based “Workers’ Party for Social Justice”. This political party sees itself as radical and anti-establishment, it has links to the far-right underground scene, and protest activities in the form of various marches constitute its major political strategy. First, I conducted my research “at a distance” (e.g., by examining various extreme right websites and studied statistical information on the extreme right available on the website of the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic), but then I engaged in participant observation. On the basis of a comparison of the two approaches I shall demonstrate that avoiding close-up research and relying solely on Internet research, surveys, questionnaires, journalistic accounts or even on interviews not reinforced by participant observation leads to a distorted picture. I hope to exemplify that there are certain types of data that can only be obtained through participant observation and thus that certain research questions can only be answered through this methodological tool. Furthermore, I shall show that participant observation helps to generate original data and offer innovative interpretations unavailable from studies relying on other methods. A case in point is the protest politics practised by far-right entities.


Download data is not yet available.


The Association of Social Anthropologists in the UK (accessed 09.09.2022)

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harward University Press.

Back, Les. 2002. “Aryans Reading Adorno: Cyber-culture and twenty-first century racism.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (4): 628-651.

Charvát, Jan. 2007. Současný politický extremismus a radikalismus [Contemporary political extremism and radicalism]. Praha: Portál.

Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association (accessed 09.09.2022)

Česká asociace pro sociální antropologii (accessed 09.09.2022)

D’Alessio, Dave. and Allen, Mike. 2000. “Media bias in presidential elections: a meta analysis.” Journal of Communication 50 (4): 133–156.

Eberl, Jakob-Moritz. Boomgaarden, Hajo, G. and Wagner, Markus. 2015. “One Bias Fits All? Three Typesof Media Bias and Their Effects on Party Preferences.” Communication Research 44 (8): 1125-1148.

Fangen, Katrin. 1998a “Right-wing skinheads: Nostalgia and binary oppositions.” Young 6(3):33-49.

Fangen, Katrin. 1998b “Living Out Our Ethnic Instincts: Ideological Beliefs Among Right-Wing Activists in Norway,” In Nation and Race: The Developing Euro-American Racist Subculture, edited by Jeffrey Kaplan and Tore Bjorgo, Boston: Northeastern University Press,202-230.

Friedman, Jonathan. 1994. Consumption and Identity. London: Harwood Academic Press.

Friedman, Jonathan. 2002 “Champagne liberals and the new dangerous classes: Reconfigurations of class, identity and cultural production in the contemporary global system.” Social Analysis 46(2): 33-55.

Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Morning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.

Humphrey, Caroline. 2002. “’Eurasia’, ideology and the political imagination in provincial Russia.” In Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia, edited by Chris M.Hann, London: Routledge, 258-276.

Mareš, Miroslav. 2003. Pravicový extremismus a radikalismus v ČR. Brno: Barrister & Principal: Centrum strategických studií.

Mareš, M. & Vejvodová, P. 2006. “De˘lnická strana: profil české pravicove˘ extremistické strany”, Rexter. (accessed on 07.03.2011)

Mareš, M. and Vejvodová, P. 2011. “Transnacionální dimenze soudobého českého neonacismu”. Mezinárodní vztahy 46 (1): 75-90.

Miller, Daniel, and Slater, Don. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic (accessed 09.09.2022)

Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic Strategy for Combating Extremism in 2009 (accessed 09.09.2022)

Narotzky, Susana. 2015. “The organic intellectual and the production of class in Spain.” In Anthropologies of Class: Power, Practice and Inequality, edited by James G. Carrier and Don Kalb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53-71.

Pasieka, Agnieszka. 2017 “Taking far-right claims seriously and literally: anthropology and the study of right-wing radicalism.” Slavic Review 76, no. S1: S19-S29.

Pasieka, Agnieszka. 2019. “Anthropology of the far right, or: What if we like the unlikeable others?” Anthropology Today 35(1): 3-6.

Pilkington, Hilary. Omelchenko, Elena. and Garifzianova, Al‘bina. 2010. Russia’s Skinheads: Exploring and Rethinking Subcultural Lives. London: Routledge.

Pilkington, Hilary. 2016. Lound and proud: Passion and politics in the English Defence League. Manchester University Press.

STEM (accessed 31.01.2022)

Security Information Service (accessed 09.09.2022)

Vandas, Tomáš. 2012. Od republikánů k Dělnické straně. Praha: Dělnická strana sociální spravedlnosti.

Workers’ Party for Social Justice electoral results (accessed 09.09.2022)



2022-12-30 — Updated on 2023-01-26

How to Cite