Combining experiment and ethnoarchaeology to differentiate the surface conditions of animal hides
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23858/SA/76.2024.1.3624Keywords:
Etnoarchaeology, experiment, use-wear analysis, hide processing, large hideAbstract
There is a wide range of technical processes involved in working animal skins, depending on the environment, the size of the skins and the purpose of the work (clothing, tent covers, etc.). The archaeological tools and their shape, weight, and use-wear are often the only evidence of these technical processes. Their understanding requires an experimental approach combined with ethnoarchaeological data to establish protocols allowing processes compatible with the type of skin to be treated and carry out the correct gestures at each stage of the process. This study, dedicated to the processing of very large hides, presents the experimental replication of the production process of moose hides observed in Canada (B.C.) in an Athaspakan group. The functional analysis of the experimental tools allows identifying different wear patterns corresponding to different surface conditions of animal hides; each of them having particular implications for the interpretation of the archaeological record.
Downloads
References
Audoin-Rouzeau F. and Beyries S. (eds) 2002. Le travail du cuir de la préhistoire à nos jours. Antibes: Editions APDCA.
Audouze F. and Beyries S. 2007. Chasseurs de renne d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. In S. Beyries and V. Vate (eds), Les civilisations du renne d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. Approches ethno historiques, archéologiques et anthropologiques. Antibes: Editions APDCA, 185-208.
Beyries S. 2003. Ethno-archéologie du travail du cuir: l’exemple de la Colombie-Britannique. In R. Cordoba de le Llave (eds), Mil anos de trabajo del cuero. Cordoba: Sociedad Espanola de Historia de las Ciencas y de las Tecnocas, Universidad de Cordoba, 443-462.
Beyries S. 1999. Etnoarchaeology: a method of experimentation. In L. R. Owen and M. Porr (eds), Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte. Tübingen: Mo Vince Verlag, 75-88.
Beyries S. 2008. Le travail du cuir: approches ethno-archéologiques. Anthropozoologica 43, 1, 9-42.
Beyries S. 2002. Le travail du cuir chez les Tchouktches et les Athapaskans: implications ethnoarchéologiques. In S. Beyries and F. Audouin-Rouzeau (eds), Le travail du cuir de la préhistoire à nos jours. Antibes: Editions APDCA, 143-159.
Beyries S., Vasiliev’ S., Karlin C., Tchesnokov Y., David F. and D’iatchenko V. 2001. Ui1, a Paleolithic site in Siberia: an ethno-archaeological approach. In S. Beyries and P. Pétrequin (eds), Ethnoarchaeology and its transfers. Oxford: BAR International series 983, 9-22.
Beyries S. and Rots V. 2008a. Le traitement des peaux: reconstitution des outils et des proceeds. Anthropozoologica 43/1, 9-42.
Beyries S. and Rots V. 2008b. The contribution of ethnoarchaeological macro- and microscopic wear traces to the understanding of archaeological hide-working process. In L. Longo and N. Skakun (eds), Prehistoric Technology 40 years later: Functional Studies and the Russian Legacy. Verona: BAR International Series, 21-28.
Brandt S. A. and Weedman K. J. 2002. The ethnoarchaeology of hide working and stone tool use in Konso, Southern Ethiopia. In S. Beyries and F. Audouin-Rouzeau (eds), Le travail du cuir de la préhistoire à nos jours. Antibes: Editions APDCA, 113-142.
Chahine C. 2002. Évolution des techniques de fabrication du cuir et problémes de conservation. In S. Beyries and F. Audouin-Rouzeau (eds), Le travail du cuir de la préhistoire à nos jours. Antibes: Editions APDCA, 13-30.
Clark J. D. and Kurashina H. 1981. A Study of the Work of a Modern Tanner in Ethiopia and Its Relevance for Archaeological Interpretation. In R. A. Gould and M. B. Schiffer (eds), Modern Material Culture. San Diego: Academic press, 303-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-293580-0.50029-9
David F., D’iatchenko V. I., Karlin C. and Tchesnokov Y. V. 1998. Du traitement des peaux en Sibérie: Dolganes et autres nomades du Nord. Boreales 74/77, 111-137.
Delaporte Y. and Roue M. 1978. La préparation de la peau du renne chez les Lapons de Kautokeino. Journal d’agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée 4, 219-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/jatba.1978.3773
D’iatchenko V. I. and David F. 2002. La préparation traditionnelle des peaux de poissons et de mammifères maris chez les populations de l’Extręme-Orient sibérien de langue toungouze. In S. Beyries and F. Audouin-Rouzeau (eds), Le travail du cuir de la préhistoire à nos jours. Antibes: Editions APDCA, 175-192.
Edholm S. and Wilder T. 1997. Wet-scraper brain tanned buckskin: a practical guide to homme tanning and use. California: Polytechnics.
Emmerich Kamper T. 2020. Determining Prehistoric Skin Processing Technologies. The macro and microscopic characteristics of experimental samples. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 220.
Frink L. and Weedman K. J. (eds) 2005. Gender and hide production. Altamira Press: Oxford.
Gallagher J. P. 1977. Contemporary stone tools in Ethiopia: implications for archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology 4, 407-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/009346977791490131
Gallagher J. P. 1974. The preparation of hides with stone tools in South Central Ethiopia. Journal of Ethiopian studies 12/1, 177-182.
Gauvrit Roux E. 2019. Comportements techniques au Magdalénien moyen ancien Approche technofonctionnelle de l’industrie lithique de deux gisements du Centre Ouest de la France: la Marche (Vienne) et la Garenne (Indre). Nice: Université Côte d’Azur.
Gauvrit Roux E. and Beyries S. 2018. Le travail de la peau au Magdalénien moyen ancien: analyse techno-fonctionnelle des grattoirs de la Marche (Lussac-les-Châteaux, Vienne). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 115/4, 647-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2018.14943
Jardon P. and Sacchi D. 1994. Traces d’usage et indices de réaffűtages et d’emmanchements sur des grattoirs magdaléniens de la grotte Gazel à Sallèles-Cabardes (Aude – France). L’Anthropologie 98, 427-446.
Klokkernes T. 2007. Skin processing technology in Eurasian reindeer cultures. A comparative study in material science of Sàmi and Evenk methods-perspectives on deterioration and preservation of museum artifacts. PhD thesis, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, The Schoom of Conservation-Museum of Cultural History-University of Oslo, Oslo.
Kobayashi Issenman B. 1997. Sinews of Survival. The Living Legacy of Inuit Clothing. Vancouver: UBC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774856416
Perkins S. M., Vehik S. C. and Drass R. R. 2008. The Hide Trade and Wichita Social Organization: An Assessment of Ethnological Hypotheses Concerning Polygyny. Plains anthropologist 53/208, 431-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/pan.2008.032
Robbe B. 1975. Le traitement des peaux de phoque chez les Ammassalimiut, observé en 1972 dans le village de Tîleqilaq. Objets et Mondes 15/2, 199-208.
Schultz J. M. 1989. Prehistoric Bison Hide Processing on the Plains. Unpublished Master’s, University of Oklahoma, Norman
Steinbring J. 1992. The lunar deflesher: a unique decorated bone tool. Manitoba archaeological Newsletter 4/1, 1-3.
Steinbring J. 1966. The manufacture and use of bone defleshing tools. American Antiquity 31/4, 575-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2694394
Tepper L.H. 1994. Earth line and Morning star: Nlaka’pamux clothing traditions. Quebec: Canadian Museum Civilization.
Weedman K. 2006. An ethnoarchaeological study of hafting and stone tool diversity among the Gamo of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13/3, 189-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-006-9010-4
Weedman K. J. 2000. An ethnoarchaeological study of stone scrapers among the Gamo people of southern Ethiopia. PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sprawozdania Archeologiczne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
