State of research and research possibilities of early medieval pottery from the Prague production zone

Authors

  • Ivana Boháčová

Keywords:

early Middle Ages, archaeology, pottery, Prague, chronology, Ceramic Reference Collection

Abstract

The current aim of the study of pottery from the Prague production zone is a detailed understanding of the changes in the pottery in connection with chronology and an explanation of the essence and causes of these changes while also capturing similarities and differences within the studied region. Accomplishing these goals will require a detailed evaluation of a larger number of pottery collections from key stratified contexts, i.e., from specific, chronologically well-defined contexts which were, for example, unaffected by post depositional processes, created in clearly demarcated intervals or allowing an absolute chronology to be established for the events that they document. A comparative online database of pottery from the Prague production zone created for this purpose should speed up the flow of information on key reference collections from the studied area

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartošková, A. 1999. Zánikový horizont budečské akropole (Ke chronologii raně středověké keramiky), Archeologicke rozhledy 51: 726–739
Boháčová, I. 1996a. Nejstarší horizonty Severního traktu Pražského hradu a jejich keramický inventář. In Z. Kurnatowska (ed.), Słowiańszczyzna w Europie średniowiecznej 1, Wrocław, 215–325
Boháčová, I. 1996b. Nejstarší stratifikovaná keramika a studium hradištního opevnění Pražského hradu, Archaeologia historica 21: 483–492
Boháčová, I. 2003. Keramika. In Stara Boleslav. Přemyslovsky hrad v ranem středověku, Mediaevalia archaeologica 5, Praha, 393–458
Boháčová, I. 2008. The archaeology of the dawn of Prague. In I. Boháčová and L. Poláček (eds), Burg – Forburg – Suburbium. Zum Problematik der Nebenareale frűhmittelalterlicher Zentren, Internationale Tagungen in Mikulčice 7, 1 Brno, 03–119
Boháčová, I. 2009. Pražský hrad a Malá Strana v raném středověku a problém synchronizace jejich vývoje. In S. Moździoch (ed.), Stare i nowe w średniowieczu. Pomiędzy innowacją a tradycją, Spotkania Bytomskie 6, Wrocław, 71–98
Boháčová, I. 2011. Prague, Budeč and Boleslav. The reflection of state formation in Early Medieval archaeological sources. In J. Macháček and Š. Ungerman (eds), Frühgeschichtliche Zentralorte in Mitteleuropa, Studien zur Archäologie Europas 14, Bonn, 371–395
Boháčová, I. 2013. Počátky budování přemyslovského státu a jeho centra – synchronizace výpovědi archeologických pramenů a jejich interpretace, Archaeologia historica 38: 7–25
Čiháková, J. 2012. Otázky chronologie pražské raně středověké keramiky, Staleta Praha 28: 91–120
Dvorská, J. and Boháčová, I. 1999. Das historische Holz im Kontext der archäologischen Untersuchungen der Prager Burg. In L. Poláček and J. Dvorská (eds.), Probleme der mitteleuropäischen Dendrochronologie und naturwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Talaue der Marc, Internationale Tagungen in Mikulčice 5, Brno, 55–67
Gregerová, M. 2012. Petrograficka charakteristika a chemicke složeni keramickych artefaktů Praha – Hradčany Loretánské nám. [odborný posudek] Archeologický ústav AV ČR, Praha, v.v. i., čj. txt2012_497
Hrdlička, L. 1993. Poznámky k chronologii pražské středověké keramiky, Archeologicke rozhledy 45: 93–112
Richter, M. 1982. Hradištko u Davle. Městečko ostrovského katera, Praha
Šolle, M. 1966. Stará Kouřim a projevy velkomoravské kultury v Čechach, Praha

Downloads

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Boháčová, I. (2017). State of research and research possibilities of early medieval pottery from the Prague production zone. Archaeologia Polona, 55, 17–34. Retrieved from https://journals.iaepan.pl/apolona/article/view/269

Issue

Vol. 55 (2017): Pottery and glass in contemporary studies

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

I declare that the manuscript sent is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors mentioned and that there are no other persons who would meet the criteria for authorship but were not mentioned. In addition, I confirm that the order of the authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all the authors.
I confirm that the correspondent author is the only contact with the Editorial Board in the editorial process, and is responsible for communicating with other authors and informing them about the progress, corrections and final approval of the article.