An uneasy partnership. On the relationship between ethnology and history

Authors

  • Kamila Baraniecka-Olszewska

Keywords:

Polish anthropology, history, discipline boundaries, historical reenactment

Abstract

This article is intended to demonstrate that, in spite of the common perception that the role of Polish ethnology among the branches of science is deliberately played down, it is very much possible today to speak of our discipline’s particular success: increasingly often, ethnology provides an inspiration for other branches and inspires their theories and methodologies. Referring to phenomena current in the Polish culture, I intend to convince my Readers that the process of “genre-mixing”, and especially the mutual influence of history on ethnology and vice-versa, are indispensable to arrive at a correct interpretation of the described phenomena. At the same time, I wish to demonstrate that that sort of purism which in the academic circles accompanies the perception of divisions between disciplines – and which includes the jealous guarding of one’s own little field of knowledge and denying other disciplines access to that field’s academic yield – is dishonest, since ethnology, for example, draws from other fields freely and much. Taking this image of contemporary anthropology as my starting point, I put forward the question whether, in these circumstances, it is at all justified to speak of auxiliary disciplines and to draw acute dividing lines between particular sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnew V. 2004, Introduction: What is Reenactment?, Criticism, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 327–339
Bogacki Michał 2010, „Wżywanie się” w przeszłość – odtwórstwo historyczne a nauka, [in:] eds. K. Obremski, J. Wenta, Recepcja kultury średniowiecznej w humanistyce, Toruń
Clifford J. 1988, Predicament of Culture. Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art, United States of America
Cook A. 2004, The Use and Abuse of Historical Reenactment: Thoughts on Recent Trends in Public History, Criticism, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 487–496
Gapps S. 2009, Mobile monuments: A view of historical reenactment and authenticity from inside the costume cupboard of history, Rethinking History, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 395–409
Grootde J. 2009, Consuming History. Historians and Heritage in Contemporary Popular Culture, London–New York
Domańska E. 1999, Mikrohistorie. Spotkania w międzyświatach, Poznań
Evans-Pritchard E. E. 1962, Anthropology and History, [in:] E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Essays in Social Anthropology, London
Faubion J. D. 1993, History in Anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 22, pp. 35–54
Geertz C. 1990, History and Anthropology, New Literary History, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 321–335
Geertz C. 1996, O gatunkach zmąconych (Nowe konfiguracje myśli społecznej), [in:] ed. R. Nycz, Postmodernizm. Antologia przekładów, Kraków
Hastrup K. 1995, A Passage to Anthropology: Between Experience and Theory, London–New York
Jasiewicz Z. 2004, Etnologia Polska przed rokiem 1956 i jej reakcja na wprowadzenie wzorów radzieckich, Etnografia Polska, vol. XLVIII, no. 1–2, pp. 5–15
Jones D. H. 1963, History and Anthropology. Essays in Social Anthropology by E. E. Evans-Pritchard (Review), Journal in African History, vol. 4., no. 2, pp. 291–292
Kopczyńska-Jaworska B. M., Kuźma I., Wilbik M. 2009, Problemy dotyczące klasyfikacji i opisu w branżowej bazie bibliograficznej na przykładzie internetowej „Bibliografii Etnografii Polskiej”, http://eprints.rclis.org/13516/ (accessed 10 July 2013)
Kutrzeba-Pojnarowa A. 1948, Rozwój etnografii i etnologii w Polsce, Kraków
Kwiatkowski P. T. 2008, Pamięć zbiorowa społeczeństwa polskiego w okresie transformacji, Warszawa
Lowenthal D. 2009, The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History, Cambridge
Lowenthal D. 2011, The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge
Lowie R. 1937, The History of Ethnological Theory, New York
Piątkowski K. 2011, Mit – historia – pamięć. Kulturowe konteksty antropologii/etnologii, Łódź
Pitt-Rivers J. 1963, History and Anthropology (Review), Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 253–258
Sahlins M. 2006, Wyspy historii, Kraków
Smyrski Ł. 2013, Mróz na Wschodzie. Kontekst badań etnograficznych, [in:] eds. Ł. Smyrski, K. Waszczyńska, Etnograficzne wędrówki po obszarach antropologii
Sokolewicz Z. 1973, Szkoły i kierunki w etnografii polskiej (do 1939 r.), [in:] ed. M. Terlecka, Historia etnografii polskiej, Wrocław
Szendak T. et al. 2012, Dziedzictwo w akcji. Rekonstrukcja historyczna jako sposób uczestniczenia w kulturze, Warszawa
Thomas K. 1963, History and Anthropology, Past & Present, no. 24, pp. 3–24
Tokarska-Bakir J. et al. 2007, Raport z badań podlaskich 2007, http://www.archiwumetnograficzne.edu.pl/downloads/raportzbadan_podlaskich.pdf (accessed 10 July 2013)
Zanikające granice. Antropologizacja nauki i jej dyskursów 2009, eds. A. Pomieciński, S. Sikora, Poznań

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

How to Cite

Baraniecka-Olszewska, K. (2013). An uneasy partnership. On the relationship between ethnology and history. Ethnologia Polona, 7–19. Retrieved from https://journals.iaepan.pl/ethp/article/view/593

Issue

Section

Articles