“You Speak Ukrainian Very Well”. Language Encounters during Ethnographic Fieldwork

Tomasz Kosiek

doi:10.23858/EP67.2023.3417

Opublikowane: 2023-12-22

Tom 67 (2023)

“You Speak Ukrainian Very Well”. Language Encounters during Ethnographic Fieldwork

Tomasz Kosiek

Etnografia Polska

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.23858/EP67.2023.3417

Abstrakt

Some students of anthropology must be familiar with passages from Bronisław Malinowski’s work (1981), in which, based on his personal field experience gained in the Trobriand Islands, he formulated guidelines and postulates defining a new type of research method in social anthropology. One of the most important aspects of Malinowski’s methodological manifesto was drawing attention to the fact that the language of the studied community is a necessary tool. Malinowski strongly emphasised that ethnographers cannot explore the culture of the studied communities, and especially their “spirit”, without knowing the language of the local people. Thus, the ability to speak the respondents’ language, in addition to long-term research, became a rubric for ethnographic studies. In this article, the starting point for the reflection on ethnographic presence in the field is the language and the ethnographer’s level of linguistic (in)competence. Using my own research experience as an example, I show that the language of locals spoken by ethnographers is not only a tool for communication with fieldwork partners, but also that the very use of this language and the level of its competence or the use of its specific variants can become, if ethnographic reflexivity is maintained, the subject of observation and reflection, revealing selected aspects of the explored community and its culture.

Słowa kluczowe:

mniejszość ukraińska, Polska, Rumunia, język, ukraiński, badania etnograficzne, metodologia

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Kosiek, T. (2023). “You Speak Ukrainian Very Well”. Language Encounters during Ethnographic Fieldwork. Etnografia Polska, 67. https://doi.org/10.23858/EP67.2023.3417

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Amit Vered (ed.) 2000, Constructing the Field. Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World, Routledge, London and New York.
Google Scholar

Angrosino Michael 2007, Doing Ethnographic and Observational Research, SAGE Publications Ltd., London.
Google Scholar

Bilaniuk Laada 2005, Contested Tongues. Language Politics and Cultural Correction in Ukraine, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, London.
Google Scholar

Borchgrevink Axel 2003, Silencing language. Of anthropologists and interpreters, Ethnography, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 95–121.
Google Scholar

Buliński Tarzycjusz, Kairski Mariusz (eds.) 2013, Teren w antropologii. Praktyka badawcza we współczesnej antropologii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Etnografia. Praktyki, teorie, doświadczenia. Antropolog w terenie. Osobiste wymiary doświadczeń etnograficznych 2021, vol.7.
Google Scholar

Halemba Agnieszka 2015, Not Looking through a National Lens? Rusyn-Transcarpahian as an Anational Self-Identification in Contemporary Ukraine, [in:] Y. Kleimann, A. Rabus (eds.), Aleksander Brückner revisited. Debatten um Polen und Polentum in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Wallenstein Verlag, pp. 197–220.
Google Scholar

Halstead Narmala, Hirsch Eric, Okely Judith (eds.) 2008, Knowing How to Know. Fieldwork and the Ethnographic Present, Berghahn Books, New York, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Herman Aleksandra 2019, Kulturowa wiedza kobiet. Transfer międzypokoleniowy w warunkach podwójnej marginalizacji Ukrainek z mniejszości narodowej w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Kosiek Tomasz 2008, „Wspólnota na różnicy budowana”. Kilka uwag o małżeństwach mieszanych polsko-ukraińskich w Białym Borze, [in:] M. Buchowski (ed.), Polska-Ukraina. Pogranicze kulturowe i etniczne, Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze i Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław, pp. 139–149.
Google Scholar

Kosiek Tomasz 2014, „Ukraińska” mniejszość narodowa w rumuńskim Maramureszu i problemy jej tożsamości, (niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska), Poznań.
Google Scholar

Kosiek Tomasz 2018, Polsko-ukraińskie małżeństwa mieszane – między przeszłością a współczesnością. Uwagi na marginesie życia w Białym Borze, Prace Etnograficzne, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 47–64.
Google Scholar

Kosiek Tomasz 2019, When „the Other” Becomes Someone Close… Ethnological Self-reflections on Functioning in a Ukrainian Community in Biały Bór, [in:] M. Zowczak (ed.), Catholic Religious Minorities in the Times of Transformation. Comparative Studies of Religious Culture in Poland and Ukraine, Peter Lang, Berlin pp. 339–360.
Google Scholar

Kosiek Tomasz 2020, Ukraińcy, Rusini Karpaccy, Huculi, corcitură… Tożsamość etniczna i indyferentyzm narodowy w Marmaroszu, Lud, vol. 104, pp. 383–411.
Google Scholar

Labbé Morgane 2019, National indifference, statistics and the constructivist paradigm: the case of the Tutejsi (‘the people from here’) in interwar Polish censuses, [in:] M. Van Ginderachter, J. Fox (eds.) National Indifference and the History of Nationalism in Modern Europe, Routledge, New York, pp.161–179.
Google Scholar

Lehmann Rose 2010, From ethnic cleansing to affirmative action: exploring Poland’s struggle with its Ukrainians minority (1944–1989), Nations and Nationalism, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 285–307.
Google Scholar

Len’o Pavlo 2010, Etnokul’turni procesy v seredovyshchi ukraїnciv Maramorshchyny, Narodna tvorchist’ ta etnolohiia, vol. 3, pp. 36–46.
Google Scholar

Ładykowski Paweł 2021, Utracony wschód. Antropologiczne rozważania o polskości, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Magocsi Paul Robert, Pop, Ivan 2005, Maramorosh, [in:] P. R. Magocsi, I. Pop (ed.), Encyclopedia of Rusyn History and Culture. Revised and Expanded Edition, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Baflo, London, pp. 320.
Google Scholar

Magocsi Paul Robert 2021, Subcarpathian Rus’: The Shaping of a National Identity (1848–1948). Secend edition, revised and expanded, Valerii Padiak Publishers, Uzhhorod.
Google Scholar

Malinowski Bronisław 1981, Argonauci Zachodniego Pacyfiku. Relacje o poczynaniach i przygodach krajowców z Nowej Gwinei, tłum. B. Olszewska-Dyoniziak, S. Szynkiewicz, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Moore Leslie C. 2009, On Communicative Competence in the Field, Language & Communication, vol. 29, pp. 244–253.
Google Scholar

Motyka Grzegorz 2023, From the Volhynian Massacre to Operation Vistula. The Polish-Ukrainan Conflict 1943–1947, Brill Schöningh, Paderborn, DOI: 10.30965/9783657795376_001.
Google Scholar

Okely Judith 2008, Knowing without Notes, [in:] N. Halstead, E. Hirsch, J. Okely (eds.), Knowing How to Know. Fieldwork and the Ethnographic Present, Berghahn Books, New York, Oxford, pp. 55–74.
Google Scholar

Okely Judith 2012, Anthropological Practice. Fieldwork and the Ethnographic Method, Routledge, London and New York.
Google Scholar

Ottenberg Simon 1990, Thirty Years of Fieldnotes: Changing Relationship to the Text, [in:] R. Sanjek (ed.), Fieldnotes: The Making of Anthropology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, London, pp. 139–160, DOI: 10.7591/9781501711954.
Google Scholar

Pactwa Bożena 2014, Pamięć o przeszłości jako element odtwarzania tożsamości etnicznej mniejszości ukraińskiej w Polsce, [in:] G. Libor, M. Michalska (ed.), Wieloproblemowość – wybrane aspekty ponowoczesności, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice, pp. 85–98.
Google Scholar

Pavliuk Mykola, Zhukovsky Arkadii 1993, Maramureş region [in:] V. Kubijovyc, D. Husar Struk (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ukraine, T. 3, University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Toronto, pp. 305–307.
Google Scholar

Pavlûk Mykola, Robčuk Ivan 2003, Ukraїns’ki govory Rumuniї, Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Edmonton-L’viv–New York–Toronto.
Google Scholar

Pisuliński Jan 2017, Przesiedlenie ludności ukraińskiej z Polski do USRR w latach 1944–1947, Wydawnictwo Libra, Rzeszów.
Google Scholar

Snyder Timothy 2003a, Akcja “Wisła” a homogeniczność społeczeństwa polskiego, [in:] Jan Pisuliński, Akcja „Wisła”, Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Snyder Timothy 2003b, The Reconstruction of Nations. Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus 1569-1999, Yale University Press, New Haven – London.
Google Scholar

Tanu Danau, Dales Laura 2016, Language in fieldwork: Making visible the ethnographic impact of the researcher’s linguistic fluency, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, vol. 27, pp. 353–369, DOI:10.1111/taja.12150.
Google Scholar

Tedlock Barbara 1991, From participant observation to the observation of participant. The emergence of narrative ethnography, Journal of Anthropology Research, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 69–94.
Google Scholar

Van Ginderachter Maarten, Fox Jon (ed.) 2019, National Indifference and the History of Nationalism in Modern Europe, Routledge, New York.
Google Scholar

Wangler Alexandra 2012, Rethinking History, Reframing Identity. Memory, Generations, and the Dynamics of National Identity in Poland, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden.
Google Scholar

Winchatz Michaela R. 2006, Fieldworker or Foreigner? Ethnographic Interviewing in Nonnative Languages, Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 83–97, DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279902.
Google Scholar

Wylegała Anna 2013, Badacz z Polski na Ukrainie: problemy metodologiczne, Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 140–151, DOI:10.18778/1733-8069.9.4.09.
Google Scholar

Zahra Tara 2010, Imagined Noncommunities: National Indifference as a Category of Analysis, Slavic Review, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 93–119, DOI:10.1017/S0037677900016715.
Google Scholar