Contemporary Dimension of Heritage Promotion – Towards Socially Engaged Archaeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23858/SA68.2016.001Keywords:
knowledge popularization, heritage, popular archaeology, applied archaeology, local communitiesAbstract
In this paper we present the outcomes of a public archaeology project entitled: Applied archaeology: Societypast- remote sensing. The project aimed to study the social dimension of archaeology and ways of popularizing knowledge of the past within society. In the article we present the results of the interviews and polls that were carried out with the inhabitants of the region in which archaeological work was carried out. On the basis of these results we present and analyze the social expectations towards archaeology as well as the kind of challenges presented to archaeologists by local communities. We also describe how an archaeologist and his work are perceived and ask whether society needs this kind of scientist and this kind of knowledge. Additional issues concern the boundaries of archaeological research and public perception of archaeological research methods.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Agnew N. and Bridgland J. (eds.) 2003. Of the Past for the Future: Integration Archaeology and Conservation. Washington: The Getty Conservation Institute ; Belcher G. 2014. Values in World Heritage Sites. In C. Sandis (ed.), Cultural Heritage Ethics: Between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Open Book Publisher, 181-196 ; Bender B. 1993. Introduction: Landscape – Meaning and Action. In B. Bender (ed.), Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Oxford: Berg, 1-17 ; Bender B. 2001. Landscape on-the-move. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(1), 75-89 ; Brown M. 2014. The Possibilities and Perils of Heritage Management. In C. Sandis (ed.), Cultural Heritage Ethics: Between Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Open Book Publisher, 171-180 ; Chirikure S. and Pwiti G. 2008. Community involvement in archaeology and cultural heritage management. An assessment from case studies in southern Africa and elsewhere. Current Anthropology 49(3), 467-487 ; Czerniak L. 2011. Dla kogo są wykopaliska? Profesjonaliści i społeczeństwo. In A. Marciniak, D. Minta-Tworzowska and M. Pawleta (eds.), Współczesne oblicza przeszłości. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 177-185 ; Fikus M. 2008. Popularyzacja nauki. Dla kogo, przez kogo, jak i dlaczego? PAUza Akademicka 12, 1-4 ; Gutkowska K. and Kobyliński K. 2011. Zarządzanie dziedzictwem kulturowym: nowa dziedzina nauczania akademickiego i badań naukowych, MAZOWSZE Studia Regionalne 6, 51-72 ; Goddard S. 2009. Heritage Partnerships – promoting public involvement and understanding. In Heritage and Beyond. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 141-148 ; Greenberg R. 2009. Towards an inclusive archaeology in Jerusalem: The case of Silwan/The city of David. Public Archaeology 8(1), 35-50 ; Hodder I. 2003. Archaeological reflexivity and the “local” voice. Anthropological Quarterly 76(1), 55-69 ; Hoffman T. L., Kwas M. L and Silverman H. 2002. Heritage tourism and public archaeology. The SAA Archaeological Record, 30-44 ; Holtorf C. 2005. From Stonehenge to Las Vegas. Archaeology as a Popular Culture. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press ; Holtorf C. and Högberg A. 2013. Heritage futures and the futures of heritage. In S. Bergerbrant and S. Sabatini (eds.), Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Oxford: Archaeopress, 739-746 ; Ireland T. and Schofield J. 2015. The ethics of cultural heritage. In T. Ireland and J. Schofield (eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. New York: Springer, 1-11 ; Kajda K. and Kostyrko M. 2015. Jak się napracować i nie zaangażować, czyli badania archeologiczne – wstęp wzbroniony. Biografia Archeologii 1(1), 13-18 ; Kajda K., Michalik T. and Kobiałka D. 2015. Heritage for all. A contribution to the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in archaeology: a Polish perspective. Current Swedish Archaeology 23, 131-156 ; Kobiałka D. 2011. Społeczny wizerunek archeologii – o rzeczywistości w fikcji. In A. Marciniak, D. Minta-Tworzowska and M. Pawleta (eds.), Współczesne oblicza przeszłości. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 133-148 ; Kobiałka D. 2014. Archaeology and communication with the public: archaeological open-air museums and historical re-enactment in action. European Journal of Post - Classical Archaeologies 4, 359-376 ; Kobiałka D. 2014. Let heritage die! The ruins of trams at depot no. 5 in Wrocław, Poland. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1(2), 351-368 ; Kobyliński Z. 2011. Czym jest, komu jest potrzebne i do kogo należy dziedzictwo kulturowe? MAZOWSZE Studia Regionalne 7, 21-47 ; Kristiansen K. 1993. ‘The strength of the past and its great might’; an essay on the use of the past. Journal of European Archaeology 1(1), 3-32 ; Leniaud J. M. 2009. Heritage, public, authorities, societies. In Heritage and Beyond. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 137-140 ; Mackay R. 2003. Whose archaeology? Social consideration in archaeological research design. In N. Agnew and J. Bridgland (eds.), Of the Past for the Future: Integration Archaeology and Conservation. Washington: The Getty Conservation Institute, 131-135 ; Matsuda A. and Okamura K. 2011. Introduction: new perspectives in global public archaeology. In Matsuda A. and K. Okamura (eds.), New Perspectives in Global Archaeology. New York: Springer, 1-18 ; McDavid C. 2002. Archaeologies that hurt; descendants that matter: a pragmatic approach to collaboration in the public interpretation of African-American archaeology. World Archaeology 34(2), 303-313 ; McDavid C. 2010. Public Archaeology, Activism, and Racism: Rethinking the Heritage “Product”. In M. Jay Stottman (ed.) Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World? Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 36-47 ; McGimsey C. 1972. Public Archaeology. London: Seminar Press ; Merriman N. (ed.). 2004. Public Archaeology. London & New York: Routledge ; Minta-Tworzowska D. and Olędzki Ł. (eds.) 2006. Komu potrzebna jest przeszłość? Piła: KNSA przy IP UAM w Poznaniu ; Pawleta M. 2011. The Past Industry: selected aspects of the commercialisation of the past and products of archaeological knowledge in contemporary Poland. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 63, 9-54 ; Philips T. and R. Gilchrist. 2012. Inclusive, Accessible Archaeology. In R. Skeates, C. McDavid and J. Carman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 674-691 ; Pyburn K. A. 2011. Engaged archaeology: Whose community? Which Public?. In K. Okamura and A. Matsuda (eds.) New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology. New York: Springer, 29-41 ; Russel M. 2002. No more heroes any more: the dangerous world of the pop culture archaeologist. In M. Russel (ed.), Digging Holes in Popular Culture. Archaeology and Science Fiction. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 38-54 ; Rathje W. 1979. Trace measures. In L. Sechrest (ed.), Unobtrusive Measures Today: New Directions for Methodology of Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 75-91 ; Rathje W. 2004. Archeologia zintegrowana. Paradygmat śmietniskowy. Czas Kultury 121(4), 4-21 ; Said W. 2005. Orientalizm. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka ; Schofield J. 2015. Forget about ‘heritage’: place, ethics and the Faro Convention. In T. Ireland and J. Schofield (eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage. New York: Springer, 197-210 ; Sroka J. and Rączkowski W. 2003. Wypełnić pustkę – przywracanie wymazanego dziedzictwa kulturowego– kilka uwag wprowadzenia. In W. Rączkowski and J. Sroka (eds.) Historia i kultura Ziemii Sławieńskiej 2. Sławno: Fundacja Dziedzictwo, 7-9 ; Zdziebłowski S. (ed.) 2014. Cyfrowy archeolog. Podręcznik promocji archeologii w nowych mediach. Poznań: Muzeum Archeologiczne w Poznaniu
Downloads
Published
2016-12-20
How to Cite
Kajda , K. ., & Kostyrko, M. . (2016). Contemporary Dimension of Heritage Promotion – Towards Socially Engaged Archaeology. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne, 68, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.23858/SA68.2016.001
Issue
Section
Articles
