WHY DO WE HAVE TO TURN ON THIS WASHING MACHINE? THE PROCESSES OF DOMESTICATING HOUSEHOLD TECHNOLOGY – SITUATIONS OF RESISTANCE

Marta Skowrońska

doi:10.23858/EP64.2020.011

Opublikowane: 2020-11-30

Tom 64 (2020)

WHY DO WE HAVE TO TURN ON THIS WASHING MACHINE? THE PROCESSES OF DOMESTICATING HOUSEHOLD TECHNOLOGY – SITUATIONS OF RESISTANCE

Marta Skowrońska

Etnografia Polska

Dział: Blok tematyczny

https://doi.org/10.23858/EP64.2020.011

Abstrakt

The author argues that resistance to new technology does not result from “technophobia” but rather from the fact that the new technological object is inscribed with new meanings and frameworks of action that may disturb the existing networks of practices, beliefs, and knowledge. Based on an analysis of 24 dyadic in-depth interviews and 52 individual in-depth interviews with people aged 47–91 living in Warsaw and Poznan (Poland), five sources of resistance to new domestic technologies were identified: (1) disruption of “flow” (Csikszentmihalyi 1990) – the pleasure resulting from a habitual and automatic action, the synchronization between the body and its material surroundings; (2) disruption of the “natural order of things” (the “mental map,” Kaufmann 2001) – a sense of security, durability or safety resulting from the stability of the spatial and material arrangement of the home (a sense that everything is in its place); (3) differences of standards and cultural ideals regarding acceptable practices, the quality of their performance, and their effect; (4) possible disturbance in relationships between members of the household; (5) beliefs about what is right, moral, or correct, as well as dissonances between different pieces of knowledge and beliefs, and between an opinion or belief and an embodied practice.

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Joanna Zalewska, Marta Skowrońska, TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRACTICES OF DAILY LIFE: INTRODUCTION , Etnografia Polska: Tom 64 (2020): Etnografia Polska

Pobierz pliki

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Skowrońska, M. (2020). WHY DO WE HAVE TO TURN ON THIS WASHING MACHINE? THE PROCESSES OF DOMESTICATING HOUSEHOLD TECHNOLOGY – SITUATIONS OF RESISTANCE. Etnografia Polska, 64. https://doi.org/10.23858/EP64.2020.011

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Akrich Madeline 1992, The De-Scription of Technical Objects, [in:] Shaping technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, W. Bijker, J. Law (eds.), pp. 205−224.
Google Scholar

Appadurai Arjun 1986, The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, A. Appadurai (ed.), Cambridge MA, Nowy Jork.
Google Scholar

Berker Thomas, Hartmann Maren, Punie Yves, Ward Katie (eds.) 2006, Domestication of Media and Technology, London, Open University Press.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu Pierre 2005, Dystynkcja. Społeczna krytyka władzy sądzenia, Scholar, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Marody Mirosława and Giza-Poleszczuk Anna 2004, Przemiany więzi społecznych, Scholar, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Brosnan Mark 1998, Technophobia: The Psychological Impact of Information Technology, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar

Cowan Ruth Schwartz 1976, The ‘Industrial Revolution’ in the Home: Household Technology and Social Change in the 20th Century, Technology and Culture, Vol. 17, No. 1., pp. 1−23.
Google Scholar

Csikszentmhalyi Michaly, Rochberg-Halton Eugene 1981, The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly 1990, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience,Harper and Row, New York.
Google Scholar

Dant Tim 2004, “The Driver-Car,” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol.21, No.4-5, pp. 61-79.
Google Scholar

Edensor Tim 2002, National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life, Berg Publishers, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Geertz Clifford 1983, Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology, Basic Books, New York.
Google Scholar

Giddens Anthony 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Google Scholar

Giddens Anthony 1991, Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford University Press, Standford.
Google Scholar

Kaufmann Jean-Claude, 2001, Ego: Pour une sociologie de l'individu, Nathan Université, Paris.
Google Scholar

Kopytoff Igor 19
Google Scholar

86, Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value, [in:] The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, A. Appadurai (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 3–63.
Google Scholar

Krajewski Marek 2009, “Dzisiaj jak wczoraj, jutro jak dziś. Codzienność, przedmioty i reżimy podtrzymujące,” [in:] Barwy codzienności. Analiza socjologiczna, M. Bogunia-Borowska (ed.), Scholar, Warsaw, pp. 178–200.
Google Scholar

Lie Merete and Sørensen Knut (eds.) 1996, Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press.
Google Scholar

Marody Mirosława, Giza-Poleszczuk Anna 2004, Przemiany więzi społecznych, Scholar, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Meintjes Helen 2001, ‘Washing Machines Make Lazy Women’: Domestic Appliances and the Negotiation of Women’s Propriety in Soweto, Journal of Material Culture, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 345−363.
Google Scholar

Miller Daniel 1987, Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Mylan Josephine, Southertone Dale 2017, The Social Ordering of an Everyday Practice: The Case of Laundry, Sociology, Vol. 52, No.6, pp. 1134−1151.
Google Scholar

Pink Sarah 2005, Dirty Laundry: Everyday Practice, Sensory Engagement and the Constitution of Identity, Social Anthropology, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 275–290.
Google Scholar

Reckwitz Andreas 2002, Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 243–63.
Google Scholar

Schatzki Theodore 2001, Introduction: Practice Theory, [in:] The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, E. von Savigny (eds.), Routledge, London, pp. 10–23.
Google Scholar

Schmidt Filip 2010, Teorie kuchenne. Dialektyka przyzwyczajeń i refleksyjności w koncepcji Jeana-Claude’a Kaufmanna, Kultura i Społeczeństwo, No.1, pp. 49−86.
Google Scholar

Shove Elizabeth 2003, Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality, Oxford, Berg.
Google Scholar

Shove Elizabeth, Hand Martin, Southerton Dale 2005, Explaining Showering: A Discussion of the Material, Conventional, and Temporal Dimensions of Practice, Sociological Research Online, Vol.10, No. 2, pp.101−113.
Google Scholar

Silva Elizabeth 2002, Time and Emotion in Studies of Household Technologies, Work, Employment and Society, Vol.16, No. 2, pp. 329-340.
Google Scholar

Silverstone Roger, Hirsch Eric 1992, Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, London/New York, Routledge.
Google Scholar

Skowrońska Marta 2015, Jak u siebie. Zamieszkiwanie i komfort, Nomos, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Solonari Vladimir 2002, Narrative, Identity, State: History Teaching in Moldova, East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 414−445.
Google Scholar

Sørensen Knut 2006, Domestication. The Enactment of Technology, [in:] Domestication of Media and Technology, Berker T., Hartmann M., Punie Y., Ward K. (eds.), Open University Press, London.
Google Scholar

Southerton Dale, Shove Elizabeth, Warde Alan, Deem Rosemary 2001, The Social Worlds of Caravaning: Objects, Scripts and Practices, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 71−78.
Google Scholar

Świda-Ziemba Hanna 2010, Młodzież PRL. Portrety pokoleń w kontekście historii, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Szatur-Jaworska Barbara 2000, Ludzie starzy i starość w polityce społecznej, Instytut Polityki Społecznej UW, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Veblen Thorstein 2019 [1899], The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions, Aegitas [ebook].
Google Scholar

Walker Gordon, Shove Elizabeth, Brown Sam 2014, How Does Air Conditioning Become ‘Needed’? A Case Study of Routes, Rationales and Dynamics, [in:] Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 1−9.
Google Scholar

Warde Alan 2005, Consumption and Theories of Practice, Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 131–153.
Google Scholar

Wiślicz Katarzyna 2017, Household as a Battleground of Modernity: Activities of the Home Economics Committee Affiliated to the League of Women (1957–80), Acta Poloniae Historica, vol. 115, pp. 123−150.
Google Scholar

Wyatt Sally 2007, Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet, [in:] Now Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology, N. Oudshoorn, T. Pinch (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 67–79.
Google Scholar

Zalewska Joanna 2011, Nowe przedmioty a przemiany praktyk społecznych w doświadczeniu ludzi starych, [in:] Ku socjologii starości. Starzenie się w biegu życia jednostki, J. Mucha, Ł. Krzyżowski (eds.), Wydawnictwo AGH, Kraków, pp. 201−226.
Google Scholar

Zalewska Joanna 2015, Rewolucja konsumpcyjna i kształtowanie się podmiotu emocjonalnego w perspektywie Norberta Eliasa, Kultura i Społeczeństwo, Vol. 1, pp. 115−136.
Google Scholar

Żadkowska Magdalena 2016, Para w praniu, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.
Google Scholar