Watch your pocket — krótka historia zamożności, czyli kradzieże zegarków w Londynie w XVIII wieku

Autor

  • Paweł T. Dobrowolski Collegium Civitas, plac Defilad 1, 00-901 Warszawa

Słowa kluczowe:

18 w. -- Anglia, Londyn (Anglia), symbole prestiżu, przedmioty luksusowe nowożytne, zegarki, kradzieże zegarków

Abstrakt

“WATCH YOUR POCKET” — A BRIEF HISTORY OF AFFLUENCE, OR ON POCKET WATCH THEFTS IN 18TH-CENTURY LONDON

Building on David Landes’s assumption that the growing popularity of clocks and watches was a marker of economic progress, this article probes London’s Old Bailey court records (OBSP) to assess the number of pocket watches brought as evidence of theft among the lower middle strata of metropolitan society. This statistical assessment is tied to the question whether in the second half of the 18th century the boom in the supply of and demand for „luxurious” (or semi-luxurious) products affected the lower classes of Londoners due to their growing fi nancial stabil-ity. Did the “relatively” poor become “relatively” wealthier? Two annual series are constructed: one for 1753 and the other for 1793. Watch thefts occurred as a result of highway robbery and/or housebreaking — in which case watches were simply a part of more diversifi ed loot — or in more individualized, “face to face” situations in the streets or in alehouses. In the latter case culprits were frequently women, especially prostitutes. “Watch theft cases” prove that despite the persistence of bloody code’s severe legal practices theft was increasingly punished with imprisonment sentences (although both capital sentences and deportations were signifi cant), while the number of the acquitted also grew due to more diligent scrutiny of doubtful cases. The number of cases in which pocket watches served as evidence (clocks were mentioned only twice in 1793) grew from 3.7% in 1753 to 6.8% in 1793: this was on the one hand a substantial increase and on the other a proof that a silver watch valued at 2 pounds (the most frequently stolen time measuring item) was still a marker of luxury, although it was becoming more affordable to aver-age Londoners, e.g. house servants, apprentices and lower class artisans.

Pobrania

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Berg M. 2004. In Pursuit of Luxury: Global History and British Consumer Goods in the Eighteenth Century, „Past & Present”, No. 182.

Berg M. 2007. Luxury and Pleasure in Eighteenth Century Britain, Oxford.

Bogart D. 2005. Turnpike Trusts, Infrastructure Investment and the Road Transporting Revolution in Eighteenth-Century England, „Journal of Economic History”, 65/2.

Brooks Ch. 1994. Apprenticeship, Social Mobility and the Middling Sort, 1550–1800, [w:] The Middling Sort of People: Culture, Society and Politics in England, 1550–1800, red. J. Barry, Ch. Brooks, London–Basingstoke.

Bunn J.H. 1980. The Aesthetics of British Mercantilism, „New Literary History”, 11/2.

Burke P. 1987. Conspicuous Consumption in Seventeenth-Century Italy, [w:] P. Burke, The Historical Anthropology of Early Modern Italy. Essays on Perception and Communication, Cambridge.

Caskey J.P. 1991. Pawnbroking in America: The Economics of a Forgotten Credit Market, „Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking”, 23/1.

Church R. 2000. Advertising Consumer Goods in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Reinterpretations, „The Economic History Review”, seria nowa, 53/4.

Coquery N. 2004. The Language of Success: Making and Distributing Semi-Luxury Goods in Eighteenth-Century Paris,„Journal of Design History”, 17/1.

Daniels G. 1975. The Art of Breguet, London–New York.

Dawson M.S. 2011. First Impressions: Newspaper Advertising and Early Modern English Body Imagining, 1651–1750, „Journal of British Studies”, 50/2.

Dyer Ch. 1989. Standards of Living in the Later Middle Ages. Social Change in England c.1200–1500, Cambridge.

Fairchilds C. 1997. Marketing the Counter-Reformation. Religious Objects and Consumerism in Early Modern France, [w:] Visions and Revisions of Eighteenth Century France, red. Ch. Adams, J.R. Censer, L.J. Graham, University Park.

Grassby R. 2005. Material Culture and Cultural History, „The Journal of Interdiscipli-nary History”, 35/4.

Green D.R. 1995. From Artisans to Paupers: Economic Change and Poverty in London, 1790–1870, Hants.

Hatcher J. 1998. Labour, Leisure and Economic Thought before the Nineteenth Century, „Past & Pre-sent”, 160.

Henderson T. 1999. Disorderly Women in Eighteenth Century London: Prostitution and Control in the Metropolis,1730–1830, New York.

Himmelfarb G. 1984. The Idea of Poverty. England in the Early Industrial Age, London–Boston.

Hitchcock T. 2004. Down and out in Eighteenth-Century London, London–New York.

Hufton O.H. 1974. The Poor of Eighteenth Century France,1750–1789, Oxford.

Hufton O. 1984. Women without Men: Widows and Spinsters in Britain and France in the Eighteenth Century, „Journal of Family History”, 9.

Jackson I. 2004. Approaches to the History of Readers and Reading in Eighteenth Century Brita-in, „The Historical Journal”, 47/4.

Jankiewicz S. 2012. A Dangerous Class: The Street Sellers of Nineteenth Century London, „Journal of Social History”, 46/2.

Jones A.H. 1980. Wealth of a Nation to Be: The American Colonies on the Eve of the Revolution, New York.

Jones C. 1996. The Great Chain of Buying: Medical Advertisement, the Bourgeois Public Sphere, and the Origins of the French Revolution, „The American Historical Review”, 101.

Karpiński A. 1983. Pauperes. O mieszkańcach Warszawy XVI i XVII wieku, Warszawa.

Kizik E. 2001. Wesele, kilka chrztów i pogrzebów. Uroczystości rodzinne w mieście hanzeatyckim od XVI do XVIII wieku, Gdańsk.

Landes D. 1983. Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World, Cambridge, Mass.

Landes D. 1979. Watchmaking: A Case Study in Enterprise and Change, „Business History Review”, 53.

Lemire B. 1990. The Theft of Clothes and Popular Consumerism in Early Modern England, „Journal of Social History”, 24/2.

Lemire B. 1991. Fashion’s Favourite: The Cotton Trade and the Consumer in Britain, 1660–1800, Oxford.

Levene A. 2010. Parish Apprenticeship and the Old Poor Law in London, „Economic History Review”, 63/4.

Levene A. 2005. The Estimation of Mortality at the London Foundling Hospital, 1741–99, „Population Studies”, 59.

MacCracken G. 1988. Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities, Bloomington.

MacKay L. 1999. Why They Stole: Women in the Old Bailey, 1779–1789, „Journal of Social History”, 32/3.

McCants A.E.C. 2008. Poor Consumers as Global Consumers: The Diffusion of Tea and Coffee Drinking in the Eighteenth Century, „The Economic History Review”, seria nowa, 61/1.

McCrossen A. 2010. The “Very Delicate Construction” of Pocket Watches and Time Consciousness in the Nineteenth-Century United States, „Winterthur Portfolio”, 44/1.

Nash G.B. 1976. Urban Wealth and Poverty in Pre-Revolutionary America, „The Journal of Interdisci-plinary History”, 6.

Palk D. 2003. Private Crime in Public and Private Places: Pickpockets and Shoplifters in London, 1780–1823, [w:] The Streets of London, red. T. Hitchcock, H. Shore, London.

Pennell S. 1999. Consumption and Consumerism in Early Modern England, „The Historical Journal”, 42/2.

Pointon M.R. 1997. Strategies for Showing: Women, Possession, and Representation in English Visual Culture, 1665–1800, Oxford.

Pośpiech A. 1992. Srebrna łyżka — probierz szlacheckiej zamożności? (Przykład Wielkopolski XVII w.), [w:] Nędza i dostatek na ziemiach polskich od średniowiecza po XX wiek, red. J. Sztetyłło, Warszawa.

Reid D.A. 1976. The Decline of Saint Monday,1766–1876, „Past & Present”, No. 71.

Roberts M.L. 1998. Gender, Consumption, and Commodity Culture, „The American Historical Review”, 103/3.

Roche D. 1997. Histoire des choses banales: Naissance de la consummation dans les sociétés traditionnelles, XVIIe–XIXe siècle, Paris.

Sarti R. 1999. Vita di casa: Abitare, mangiare, vestire nell’Europa moderna, Rome.

Shinder J. 1979. Mustafa Efendi: Scribe, Gentleman, Pawnbroker, „International Journal of Middle East Studies”, 10.

Shively D.H. 1964. Sumptuary Regulation and Status in Early Tokugawa Japan, „Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies”, 25.

Schoemaker R.B. 2008. The Old Bailey Proceedings and the Representation of Crime and Criminal Justice in Eighteenth-Century London, „Journal of British Studies”, 47/3.

Schwarz L. 1999. English Servants and Their Employers during Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, „Economic History Review”, 52.

Smith C. 2002. The Wholesale and Retail Markets of London, 1660–1840, „The Economic History Review”, 55.

Smith R. 2004. The Swiss Connection: International Networks in Some Eighteenth-Century Luxury Trades, „Journal of Design History”, 17/2.

Steedman C. 2003. Servants and Their Relation-ship to the Unconscious, „The Journal of British Studies”, 42.

Thompson E.P. 1967. Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism, „Past & Present”, No. 38.

Voth H.-J. 2000. Time and Work in England, 1750–1830, New York.

Voth H.-J. 1997. Time Use in Eighteenth-Century London: Some Evidence from Old Bailey, „The Journal of Economic History”, 57/2.

Wetherill L. 1988. Consumer Behavior and Material Culture in Britain, 1670–1760, New York–London.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2015-01-01

Jak cytować

Dobrowolski, P. T. (2015). Watch your pocket — krótka historia zamożności, czyli kradzieże zegarków w Londynie w XVIII wieku. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej, 63(3), 451–470. Pobrano z https://journals.iaepan.pl/khkm/article/view/861

Numer

Dział

Studia i materiały