Kilka uwag o paleosocjologii, relacjach społecznych, polisemantyzacji kultury i teoretycznych pracach Leo Klejna – z polskiej perspektywy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23858/APol66.2021.003Keywords:
archaeological theory, historical sociology, archaeosociology, polysemantisation of culture,, source theory, archaeology, social interactionsAbstract
The text contains reflections on important issues in the field of archaeological theory such as the polysemantisation of culture and concerning palaeosociology, which use archaeological and ethnographical data to study historical social interactions and to broaden knowledge on social determinants studied by historical sociology. Among other things, these issues were made the subject of in-depth reflection by Leo S. Klejn, who defined the area under study as archaeosociology. When organizing anthropological (ethnographic) and archaeological data, we should take into account the mutual relations between complementary perspectives as conscious expressions and unconscious foundations of social life. To do this, it is helpful to apply the concept of cultural polysemantisation, which allows the study of societies without limiting starting assumptions. Artefacts may indicate noteworthy manifestations of past social structures.
Downloads
References
Barford P. 2004, Polish archaeology and Marxism: just a passing phase?, [in:] Arheolog: detektiv i myslitel’ / The archaeologist: detective and thinker: sbornik stat’ei, posvyashchennyi77-letiyu L’va Samoilovicha Kleina, L.B. Vishnyatskii, A.A. Kovalev, O.A. Shcheglova eds., Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 182–197.
Cyngot D. , Zalewska A . I . 2019, A life in archaeology and the specificity of archaeological research. Encounters with Stanisław Tabaczyński, “Archaeologia Polona”, 57, pp. 185–205.Foucault M . 1969, L’archéologie de savoir, Paris.
Foucault M . 1977, Archeologia wiedzy, Warszawa.
Hodder I . 2007, The “Social” in archaeological theory: An historical and contemporary perspective, [in:] A companion to social archaeology, L. Meskell, R.W. Preucel eds., Malden, pp. 23–42.
Klejn L . 1972, Die Konzeption des Neolithikums, Äneolithikums und der Bronzezeit in der archäologischen Wissenschaft der Gegenwart, [in:] Neolithische Studien I, L.S. Klejn, S. Tabaczyński, K. Kroitzsch eds., Berlin, pp. 7–30.
Klejn L . S . 1978, Arheologicheskie istochniki: Uchebnoe posobie, Leningrad.
Le Goff J . 1982, Intervista sulla storia, a cura di Francesco Maiello, Rome–Bari.
Maltese C . 1970, Semiologia del messagio oggettuale, Milan.
Piekarczyk S . 1971, Z problemów polisemantyzacji kultury: próba konstrukcji modelu, “Studia Źródłoznawcze. Commentationes”, 16, pp. 1–24.
Tabaczyński S . 1972, Gesellschaftsordnung und Güteraustausch im Neolithikum Mitteleuropas, [in:] Neolithische Studien, I, L.S. Klejn, S. Tabaczyński, K. Kroitzsch eds., Berlin, pp. 31–96.
Tabaczyński S . 1995, A future for the Marxist paradigm in Central European archaeology? The Polish case, [in:] Whither archaeology?, M. Kuna, N. Venclová eds., Praha, pp. 69–81.
Tabaczyński S . 2004, Coconstructing the past: the cognitive status of archaeological evidence, [in:] Arheolog: detektiv i myslitel’ / The archaeologist: detective and thinker: sbornik stat’ei, posvyashchennyi 77-letiyu L’va Samoilovicha Kleina, L.B. Vishnyatskii, A.A. Kovalev, O.A. Shcheglova eds., Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 105–113.
Tabaczyński S . 2006, Archaeology – anthropology – history. Unconscious foundations and conscious expressions of social life, “Archaeologia Polona”, 44, pp. 15–39.
Tabaczyński S . 2010, Processes of polysemantisation of culture and their fossil correlates, [in:] Rola głównych centrów kulturowych w kształtowaniu oblicza kulturowego Europy środkowej we wczesnych okresach epoki żelaza, B. Gediga, W. Piotrowski eds., Biskupin–Wrocław, pp. 13–25.
Topolski J . 1983, Teoria wiedzy historycznej, Poznań.
Topolski J . 1996, Jak się pisze i rozumie historię. Tajemnice narracji historycznej, Warszawa.
Walicki A . 1996, Marksizm i skok do królestwa wolności. Dzieje komunistycznej utopii, Warszawa.